Both are pretty bad. I wouldn't be against the FA reviewing this and adding to the ban
I dont think prison or the death penalty is fair for Suarez, however I do feel that a lengthy ban of 8-12 games is
Do you think the 10 games is fair?
If the main defence involves incidents that didn't involve Luis Suarez than its a pretty weak case, though just for the record I think it would be fair to go back and give Defoe a 10 game ban too. If Marouane Fellaini bites someone this weekend I would also suggest a 10 game ban as a suitable punishment
If they are punishing the man then they are punishing a man who has done several bad things worthy of banning and never seems to learn from his mistakes
i could argue about the inconsistencies and what not, but i think It's a bit harsh if you ask me. I heard their reasons, of which I don't agree with.
Just as a point, would you give Fellaini more of a ban as hasn't he had previous too? He's obviously not learning so would you keep on increasing the ban length until he seems to have learnt his lesson.
Which also raises the point that if someone does has a bad disciplinary record, instead of a 3 match ban for red cards would you increase it to 4 maybe, as they're eclearly not learning their lesson?
The whole thing is very inconsistent and the only good thing to come out of all this is the fact that it's shown the disciplinary process to be a bit of a farce. Hopefully this may force some changes.