I honestly don't really get the anti argument.
I'm not reading anything other than its a risk so lets not try that.
Do you think the RB position is operating well?
Do you think its been operating as well as our LB in recent times?
If Neville or Hibbert were providing the defensive and attacking balance that we've seen from Baines at his best or Lescott in his day do you think this would even merit a conversation?
Do you think our RB could be improved?
Are you happy to watch long ball after long ball?
Did you not think Coleman provided something different this season in his limited appearances? Pace on the right? Ability to beat a man?
If so why for goodness sake wouldn't we try and see if we can do better with a player we already have. We're not talking about signing someone. So what if he makes a mistake? Do Hibbert and Neville not? Did they not when they were younger too? Neville made some howlers as has Hibbert. IF anything this is the best season to be trying this as frankly we have very little to chase it seems at the moment. And I'd argue we'd dropped plenty of points of late due to our inability to break teams down, something not helped by the lack of options provided on the right.
Seriously one game, why not?? Yes its a risk...so what?? I'd rather risk 3 pts in the hope of finding a better option that gains us more in the long term. Unless Neville or Hibbert has suddenly become the equivalent of Sergio Ramos while I haven't been looking.