I thought everyone had decided domes were bad and 4 stands were good?
Atleti's new stadium is the emirates with a fancier roof, straight top tier and slightly steeper bottom tier:
This is my problem with bowl stadiums. They all look the same From the pitch/main camera angle.
Itís just soulless and devoid of inspiration or character. If you blacked out any identifying patterns in the ground, such as team names etc and did them in black and white you would have difficulty telling the difference, at pitch level at least, from the emirates to the riverside to Wembley and many others. I love the fact that if you see a game at goodison itís instantly recognisable. Even anfield, palace, Stamford Bridge and whl to a lesser extent. The only bowl I can think of that is standalone in its appearance from pitch level is West Ham. Mainly because itís so shit though.
People obsess about the external appearance so much, and thatís important. To me though itís equally important to have some sort of stand out identity inside the stadium that people watching our games, or other events will instantly recognise as Bramley-Moore.