No one has said the words but plenty have implied it.
That's the thing, I don't think anyone has. Instead of drawing conclusions based on actual events, people seem to have mostly drawn conclusions based on paper stories, and comments from Koeman and Moshiri, which, incidentally, have turned out to be inaccurate. If you read back, most people commenting on possible things unknown, have both made clear they don't know anything, and that it's just hypothetical. Yet others read that as infallible? Black and white thinking at it's finest. No-one has mentioned me by name, yet I am one of the ones suggesting other possibilities, for the simple reason that none of us know whats actually going on.. so presumably I am now classed by some as a deluded Barkley apologist. None of those people have properly read my posts methinks.
Why is it when someone "imagines" there are things behind the scenes that might change opinions, that is delusional, but people imagining he's already done a deal with Spurs are not? Personally I don't take my opinions from the paper stories.