I think it's a bit rich of people to complain about us changing to 4 from 5 at the back, when for the last several months people have been on his back for going with 5 instead of 4.
Hindsight is 20 20, but at the time I'll admit I thought it was the right move. We weren't doing enough to exploit the additional man, we were creating virtually no chances at the start of the second half. The gamble was that the additional man in midfield would help us create more and open up a 2 goal lead, rather than sitting back and hoping we would hold out.
Sadly it didn't pay off but I'd rather us make those types of more attacking gamble, rather than be a team that sits on a 1-0 lead for 60 minutes.