0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It's a relative term that considers cost vs. value.For instance, it took me about two seconds to read your post, which seems a huge expenditure of time in relation to its value.
Doesn’t score many for WBA tbh it’s a fair shout, they don’t particularly make chances for him tho.His hold up play is one of the best in the league tho, he’d be great as a 6 foot firminho basically. Get rooney Lookman Henry sig etc. all playing off and around him.
If we're gonna spend money on a striker then I want a striker who scores goals first, holds up well second.Cash money on a striker who doesn't score just isn't what we need to be doing right now.Rondon is a big no for me.
Well surely given we'd easily get our 5 million back it's not a big price tag. It's actually risk free price tag
Watched WBA hilites last night. Unimpressed with Rondon.
You can certainly see why Rondon only has two goals this year.
Paying anything, much less £5 million, for something you don't need or know how to use, and thus, get no use from, is plenty expensive. And when you're paying it £120,000 a week to sit collecting dust, it's doubly expensive.
Right away like, when you notice he's wearing a West Brom shirt.
That and when he shoots he tends to not score as well.
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 28 queries.