April 22, 2018, 08:00:31 AM

Author Topic: Jack Wilshere  (Read 5017 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

April 18, 2018, 05:03:18 PM
Reply #135
Offline

themilkycoffees


Definitely not what we need so it's definitely happening.


April 18, 2018, 05:14:06 PM
Reply #136
Offline

Waltzer


Definitely not what we need so it's definitely happening.

Are you saying hes not better than anything we've got?

April 18, 2018, 05:20:53 PM
Reply #137
Offline

themilkycoffees


Are you saying hes not better than anything we've got?

No. I'm saying better than what we've got shouldn't be the standard we're aiming for. Gana aside, we're nowhere near good enough in that area.


April 18, 2018, 05:23:04 PM
Reply #138
Offline

Lxxx


Are you saying hes not better than anything we've got?

I think he's saying there are more pressing positions that need filling than another midfielder who doesn't score or create or have that much of an influence on the team. Sure he's neat and tidy and manipulates the ball around well but if we're handing out cú150k/week contracts for that then it doesn't leave much room on the wage bill for players who actually deliver what we need, which is a creative number 10.

April 18, 2018, 10:25:20 PM
Reply #139
Offline

D15TIN


I think he's saying there are more pressing positions that need filling than another midfielder who doesn't score or create or have that much of an influence on the team. Sure he's neat and tidy and manipulates the ball around well but if we're handing out cú150k/week contracts for that then it doesn't leave much room on the wage bill for players who actually deliver what we need, which is a creative number 10.
Fair point