May 23, 2018, 04:22:20 PM

Author Topic: Bolasie vs Walcott  (Read 1413 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

April 19, 2018, 08:18:38 PM
Read 1413 times
Offline

stirlingblue


Iíve seen quite a few posts in the last week ago slating Bolasie in one breath and praising Walcott in the next.

Am I the only one who thinks the two are pretty much on par with each other?

It feels like because Walcott is new and shiny everybody is ignoring anything he does wrong, whereas Bolasie canít get credit even when he scores or creates a goal


April 19, 2018, 08:37:17 PM
Reply #1
Offline

blargins

NSNO Subscriber
Walcott is clearly the superior player.

Both are struggling though in a team that's very poor.

Put better players in, Walcott will shine. Bolasie will miss 9/10 chances he gets.
"I wouldn't be up here if I hadn't failed a million times." Nick Foles

April 19, 2018, 08:38:48 PM
Reply #2
Offline

D15TIN


Wingers will always struggle under sam allardyce, not going to see the best out of them until theyre allowed to attack.


April 19, 2018, 08:40:43 PM
Reply #3
Online

Macca77


Walcott all day and twice on a Sunday.

Next question....

April 19, 2018, 08:45:09 PM
Reply #4
Offline

D15TIN


& Walcott hit 19 last season, Bolasie has something like 12 prem goals in total.

April 19, 2018, 09:12:39 PM
Reply #5
Online

Audrey Horne

NSNO Subscriber
Walcott is obviously a lot better...
I have to return some videotapes.


April 19, 2018, 09:14:18 PM
Reply #6
Offline

kramer0


One of them can do things besides lose the ball or whip a hopeful cross into the box.

So no.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2018, 09:15:47 PM by kramer0 »

April 19, 2018, 09:40:49 PM
Reply #7
Offline

stirlingblue


& Walcott hit 19 last season, Bolasie has something like 12 prem goals in total.

Walcott played for arsenal, heís had players creating chances for him.

April 19, 2018, 09:52:33 PM
Reply #8
Offline

blargins

NSNO Subscriber
Walcott played for arsenal, heís had players creating chances for him.

Bolasie has never been good enough to even be considered by Arsenal.
"I wouldn't be up here if I hadn't failed a million times." Nick Foles

April 19, 2018, 10:30:55 PM
Reply #9
Offline

bogie


Wingers will always struggle under sam allardyce, not going to see the best out of them until theyre allowed to attack.

lol so what was he like before Sam came

he was fucking shit and is fucking shit again

April 20, 2018, 12:01:03 AM
Reply #10
Offline

stirlingblue


lol so what was he like before Sam came

he was fucking shit and is fucking shit again

Before Sam came he was injured.

He did however look quite good last year, but thatís been forgotten now because heís the new punching bag for fans who love to moan

April 20, 2018, 12:05:37 AM
Reply #11
Offline

Ross


Think Bolasie has been more threatening than Walcott for the last 4/5 games, but Walcott is more likely to nick you a scrappy goal and is more disciplined defensively. 

At the moment thereís nothing really between them.
There are only two things I can't stand in this world. People who are intolerant of other people's cultures... and the Dutch.

April 29, 2018, 10:12:31 AM
Reply #12
Offline

Free Agent


Walcott is a more versatile forward. Can play as a striker on the counter-attack. Iíd trust him more on a 1v1 situation than i would Bolasie.

And as Allardyce has shown us, Walcott is a competent fullback when we play 7 across the back line against the top 6 sides.

April 29, 2018, 12:52:01 PM
Reply #13
Online

Bluedylan


For me, Walcott's a level above Bolasie as a player, technically and in his understanding of the game. He makes better decisions.
Jeff: That's not the way to win.
Kathie: Is there a way to win?
Jeff: There's a way to lose more slowly.

April 29, 2018, 01:47:09 PM
Reply #14
Online

Jimmywhack

NSNO Subscriber
Absolute no argument at all

Walcott is levels above bolaisie


Simply simply lovely