0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Ok, well, like people talking about transfer kitties and stuff, it's clear how you have just responded there that you're ignorant to how employment contracts work in football.You say we wouldn't pay him if it isn't in his contract?Well, his contract says we will pay him £xm a year for the next 3 years.If we sell him, then it is us who have broken that contract and we would be liable for that. If he goes onto get gainful employment, then his claim is diminished by the amount he then earns. It's what did Leeds in and it's why were sueing the Dutch FA & Koeman.If he hands a transfer request in then he forgoes any claim to said monies because it is him wanting to break the contract. It's the main reason we did what we did with people like Lescott and Rooney. We save/the player loses out loads of they formally request to leave.
I keep banging on about it but Richarlison has the ability to play through the middle and having him and Lookman developing a partnership as two of the front three could blitz teams.
But they write that Silva has said, not even alledgely, that he is NOT for sale.But later on they write that they believe in german papers that RBL is closing in on EFC £20m valuation.Are Sky so adamant to sell our players that they dont even want to listen to first hand sources. A bit Trump like that...
Just posted a story on Instagram with two planes on it. Looks like he's off.
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 28 queries.