October 17, 2019, 10:54:00 PM

Author Topic: Bid rejected for Lookman  (Read 45619 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

July 21, 2018, 12:26:43 AM
Reply #15
Offline

blue slug


Minimum 40 million is really getting a bit carried away , so if 40 is the minimum whatís your actual valuation, 50, 60 ?  For a 20 year old as yet unproven prospect ?

If weíre going to pay 50 for richarlison then yeah 40 is a good place to start


July 21, 2018, 01:28:30 AM
Reply #16
Offline

blue slug


Surely itís common sense that you donít loan players you might want to keep to better teams

This just doesnít make sense

August 09, 2018, 06:30:08 PM
Reply #17
Offline

blue slug


great news he's staying, lookman, Bernard, richarlison, Walcott, tosun and gylfi. That's a lot of creativity and hopefully cenk can find the net


August 10, 2018, 08:05:38 PM
Reply #18
Offline

blue slug


With the new signings it does seem like we have a lot of wide players, do you think he'll get a look in, or is it more likely that he'll be a bit part player (at best)?

I think both richarlison and Bernard could play in the middle behind cenk

August 21, 2018, 08:34:09 PM
Reply #19
Offline

blue slug


we want 28m plus add ons apparently and hope we stick to our guns with this

August 21, 2018, 10:32:21 PM
Reply #20
Offline

blue slug


which cock lords are on talksport now


August 21, 2018, 10:35:20 PM
Reply #21
Offline

blue slug


cant stand durham absolute arse piece