0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
A better player than Tosun.He does good things, and he’s generally a great finisher, but his work rate is quite poor, he has no pace, and his movement isn’t great either.His link-up play is good sometimes, though, and he’s good in the air in front of goal, but he barely seems to jump in aerial challenges unless it’s a goalscoring chance.
To replace Tosun = world class = wanting CL football and a huge transfer fee. Unless you sign a 20 yr old and get massively lucky, to upgrade Tosun at this stage is difficult
Yeh he’d be pretty decent for a Leicester or someone but for anyone with aspirations of anything better he’s short on quality where it matters.
Exactly, you buy young, which we should’ve been doing under Walsh and Koeman
Yeah but to get guaranteed better for cheaper/ younger is very difficult. You could easily rack up 2 or 3 attempts at a decent whack and still be no better. Think we’re best off sorting everything else then going big for more of a certainty.
Leicester have got better than Tosun, though, and they are our level right now.He’s a good player, yes, but he’s a level or two below Richarlison and Walcott.
In a fully functioning attack with all the pace and movement around him that our new recruits can offer he may be more effective. I think we should wait a little longer before making a final judgement.
Agreed. I’d be surprised if he’s here this time next year. Reminds me of a championship striker, decent in and around the box but basic anywhere else. His attempt at a finish tonight was very poor, telegraphed his shot and should have put Walcott in instead for an easy finish to end the game.
Oh sure, I’m not writing him off at all, I just think for a side wanting Top 6 we need better for our main striker.
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 23 queries.