Jack Grealish

This is the new NSNO Everton forum to discuss the Mighty Blues
brap2
Posts: 5209
Karma: 5072

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

That 5 year box at HD getting its use then
NomadskiEFC
User avatar
Posts: 1786
Location: Manchester
Karma: 1043

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

Bet he's using a dodgy firestick, the skinflint
sam of the south
Posts: 2587
Karma: 2135

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

Loves the Beto
Attachments
IMG_7686.png
IMG_7686.png (4.16 MiB) Viewed 911 times
Bumble
Posts: 549
Karma: 355

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

The more I see Ndiaye back in his best position on the left the less I'm on board with us signing Grealish for next season.
Audrey Horne
User avatar
Posts: 7910
Location: 53.4389° N - 2.9662° W
Karma: 3304

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

Lets not be turning our noses up at signing a player like Grealish...
AjaxAndy
Posts: 5775
Karma: 2850

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

I think if you look at that team yesterday and replace McNeil with either Grealish or someone like Malick Fofana you have to wonder if going all in on Jack is actually smart business.

We still have no pace and signing Grealish won't change that.

Maybe in an ideal world we get Grealish on a free and £150k a week wages, then buy the next Fofana or Rayan to play backup... But not sure how feasible that is.

Given the strong links to Harry Wilson too I think our absolute priority for a wide player is pace, can't be signing multiple wingers with average at best speed.

I like Grealish, but we've arguably been maybe better without him so I don't think it's as cut and dried as just sign him no matter what tbh
777Kidnappings
Posts: 3885
Karma: 2139

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

AjaxAndy wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 4:09 pm I think if you look at that team yesterday and replace McNeil with either Grealish or someone like Malick Fofana you have to wonder if going all in on Jack is actually smart business.

We still have no pace and signing Grealish won't change that.

Maybe in an ideal world we get Grealish on a free and £150k a week wages, then buy the next Fofana or Rayan to play backup... But not sure how feasible that is.

Given the strong links to Harry Wilson too I think our absolute priority for a wide player is pace, can't be signing multiple wingers with average at best speed.

I like Grealish, but we've arguably been maybe better without him so I don't think it's as cut and dried as just sign him no matter what tbh

Yeah im not really in favour of spending 20m and 200k a week on grealish. Hes an amazing footballer but his entire game benefits the type of players we don't have

Also it does show the ridiculousness of the dibling signing. Even had it worked out really well he still wasn't what our team desperately needed. It really is vital that the summer window is a really good 1 both in terms of quality and in terms of being exactly what we need. Pace, attacking intent from full back and a goalscorer
Audrey Horne
User avatar
Posts: 7910
Location: 53.4389° N - 2.9662° W
Karma: 3304

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

We will probably just loan him again and get him free season after when his contract at city is up.

Like I said, it's a bit weird to be saying no thanks to a player like him.
777Kidnappings
Posts: 3885
Karma: 2139

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

Audrey Horne wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 4:40 pm We will probably just loan him again and get him free season after when his contract at city is up.

Like I said, it's a bit weird to be saying no thanks to a player like him.
All depends on the cost. We ain't gonna turn him down on a free
kramer
Posts: 1774
Karma: 2059

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

Look how bought in he is. He’s coming back and I’m good with it.

He’s an absolute joke of a player. The control under pressure, the way he finds space when it seems like there’s none. Best player I’ve seen wear the shirt (wasn’t around for the ‘80s or Kanchelskis).

Ndiaye was doing well bagging from the right when they were both in the team. New fullbacks to partner both of them and we are a very interesting team.
AjaxAndy
Posts: 5775
Karma: 2850

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

Audrey Horne wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 4:40 pm We will probably just loan him again and get him free season after when his contract at city is up.

Like I said, it's a bit weird to be saying no thanks to a player like him.
Just depends on the finances.

I'm not against signing him, I just don't think it's a priority. Other things we need to sort before spending anything on him even if it's just his wages as they're huge for a club like us and the new cost ratios
TheRam
Posts: 7749
Karma: 7912

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

Should be the biggest priority imo.

Not just for his talent, but for the fact he played 90 minutes every game, bar illness and suspension and looked the fittest player on the park.

Even at £20m and 200k a week I’d do it in a heartbeat.
Bluedylan1
Posts: 4553
Karma: 5283

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

I'd love to find a way to play him centrally and have him doing a Bernardo Silva type role for us.
sam of the south
Posts: 2587
Karma: 2135

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

Bluedylan1 wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 6:02 pm I'd love to find a way to play him centrally and have him doing a Bernardo Silva type role for us.
This is what I’d like us to try
AjaxAndy
Posts: 5775
Karma: 2850

Re: Jack Grealish

Post

TheRam wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 5:58 pm Should be the biggest priority imo.

Not just for his talent, but for the fact he played 90 minutes every game, bar illness and suspension and looked the fittest player on the park.

Even at £20m and 200k a week I’d do it in a heartbeat.
He played every minute of every game, and then broke down and misses the entire second half of the season. Not sure his fitness is something we should be using as a positive to sign him.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic