0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I thought Walcott and Lookman have both shown why they're not starting. They've had the chances to put the game away, and done nothing. You can't imagine had Richarlison and Bernard had those same chances it would have finished 2-0. The game turned when Richarlison started feeling his ribs in the first half.
The both looked bright, enterprising, and full of effort. It’s great when your subs look that eager.
I don't disagree with that, but those qualities alone aren't enough. There has to be a level of reliability, clinicalness and decisiveness as well.
Schneiderlin is a conundrum because he is a good player
Lookman did some really clever things on the ball, and Walcott is still our only player that can consistently get in behind. Two qualities there that we need.
If only we had an attacker who could actually finish, DCL, Walcott and Lookman all missed fairly easy chances.Schneiderlin is boss
Page created in 0.034 seconds with 20 queries.