0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Is there a "creative accounting" benefit from sending players like that out on loan? As in selling them when their book values has reduced due to amortisation, so the trading loss isn't as great? I can't be arsed working out the numbers.
Yeah there would be from a FFP point if view, providing you got the same fee in 1 or 2 years time. In the real world the cash figure is still the most important bit.
Because that's the actual revenue/cash flow, which is presumably the be all and end all?Does any profit on the book value get classed as revenue in addition to that? I'm assuming not?
Just stop being such a stresshead.
How am I stress head?I merely said parts I've read, it doesn't mean I believe them, I don't pretend it's just my opinion or that Its factual knowledge. You come out with shit like ' I gotta stop reading stuff cos I don't have the ability to decode stuff and read between the lines etc. Like I'm some sort of ten year old school kid.
What a terrible fucking purchase in the light of day that was
I was fuming with this deal from day one.Do think he could’ve been useful before the injury but even then he was never that good.
Page created in 0.052 seconds with 24 queries.