November 20, 2017, 02:00:27 AM

Author Topic: [News]Blues make Dyche their number one target  (Read 4266 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

November 02, 2017, 03:28:42 AM
Reply #60
Online

hill135


I think it's perfectly fair to lump him in with Allardyce.

Their football is identical. They're both good coaches for squeezing everything out of limited sides and having them punching slightly above their weight.

The difference is one's an unobjectionable normal bloke, one's an arrogant, corrupt bloke.

deCoubertin

November 02, 2017, 03:33:40 AM
Reply #61
Offline

Waltzer


I think it's perfectly fair to lump him in with Allardyce.

Their football is identical. They're both good coaches for squeezing everything out of limited sides and having them punching slightly above their weight.

The difference is one's an unobjectionable normal bloke, one's an arrogant, corrupt bloke.
One of them is free and probably open to a short term contract, the other we would actually have to buy and would want a long contract.

November 02, 2017, 03:34:13 AM
Reply #62
Offline

Heisenberg


This is a worse appointment than what Allarydyce would be. We knows what allardyce would be and so does he. Short term fix. What about next season? Does dyche have us challenging the top 4? winning cups? No he doesn't.

He's a negative type manager. And the only managers who are successful with that nowadays play with unlimited money and the best players.


November 02, 2017, 03:34:44 AM
Reply #63
Offline

Mayor Farnum


Not sure he's achieved anything Owen Coyle didn't.

November 02, 2017, 03:38:12 AM
Reply #64
Online

KoemansNumberTens


If we are looking at possession percentages surely it's fairer to look at the numbers in the championship against teams with at least similar budgets rather than what he does against squads worth 10 times what burnleys is worth

November 02, 2017, 03:38:43 AM
Reply #65
Offline

bluenuck


He's a negative type manager. And the only managers who are successful with that nowadays play with unlimited money and the best players.

Huh?

I'm not advocating him or anything, but He's kept Burnley up, and they're currently in 7th with limited money, and the shittiest players.


November 02, 2017, 03:42:49 AM
Reply #66
Online

KoemansNumberTens


This is a worse appointment than what Allarydyce would be. We knows what allardyce would be and so does he. Short term fix. What about next season? Does dyche have us challenging the top 4? winning cups? No he doesn't.

He's a negative type manager. And the only managers who are successful with that nowadays play with unlimited money and the best players.

Atletico have unlimited money? They are constantly losing their best players and replacing them with cheaper. What they have financially has been earned on the back of that negative football

Really don't understand the suggestion that 1 type of football is more successful than another. Leicester won the league playing negative football. Which teams are successful playing open football on a small budget. I'd suggest the only examples of success on a limited budget are Leicester and atletico both playing defensive football

November 02, 2017, 03:49:35 AM
Reply #67
Offline

Heisenberg


Atletico have unlimited money? They are constantly losing their best players and replacing them with cheaper. What they have financially has been earned on the back of that negative football

Really don't understand the suggestion that 1 type of football is more successful than another. Leicester won the league playing negative football. Which teams are successful playing open football on a small budget. I'd suggest the only examples of success on a limited budget are Leicester and atletico both playing defensive football

Both are terrible terrible examples. Atletico playing negative football is a myth. In certain big games yes.  Some of the technical players they have had over the years we could only dream of.

Leicester as well. Not negative. They fought fire with fire that seasson. The opposite of what an allardyce type team does.

November 02, 2017, 03:56:55 AM
Reply #68
Online

KoemansNumberTens


Both are terrible terrible examples. Atletico playing negative football is a myth. In certain big games yes.  Some of the technical players they have had over the years we could only dream of.

Leicester as well. Not negative. They fought fire with fire that seasson. The opposite of what an allardyce type team does.

Atletico play negative football with some great players. Think that's kind of my point. The football gets better depending on the squad. Dyche here (with a successful transfer window) would play much better football than dyche at Burnley. It's the players much more than the managers style that defines the standard.

Leicester and atletico are both defensive non possession teams. Who plays open football on their budgets with anything like their success.

I actually think it's easier to get results playing defensively. You can organise a defence brilliantly much easier than you can get 4 or 5 world class players on a budget

November 02, 2017, 03:57:20 AM
Reply #69
Offline

Waltzer


Quick lets get Dyche signed, we've just been linked to Pardew and he's in to 14-1, id honestly consider defecting to the reds if we got him as manager!😣

November 02, 2017, 04:08:04 AM
Reply #70
Offline

Running Blue


Quick lets get Dyche signed, we've just been linked to Pardew and he's in to 14-1, id honestly consider defecting to the reds if we got him as manager!😣

Then you were never a Blue to begin with.

November 02, 2017, 04:12:25 AM
Reply #71
Offline

bluenuck



November 02, 2017, 04:23:41 AM
Reply #72
Offline

Brownie20

NSNO Subscriber
[lightbox=image_url|title|group|float][/lightbox]  :cheers:

November 02, 2017, 04:24:28 AM
Reply #73
Online

Gash

Global Moderator

November 02, 2017, 04:25:13 AM
Reply #74
Offline

bluenuck


Wales midfielder? What about him?

Was throwing his hat into the ring for our new coach.

He's done wonders with the Whitecaps.