April 05, 2020, 07:33:49 AM

Author Topic: Is Schneiderlin a bad player?  (Read 18067 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

January 22, 2018, 05:31:18 AM
Read 18067 times


What’s gutting is I thought he’d be a cornerstone of our team but he’s not. He’s just another well-paid, disinterested player.

January 29, 2018, 08:39:49 PM
Reply #1


I’d bite their hands off for £20m!
He just offers nothing; doesn’t protect the back 4, can’t pass forward, suspect temperament, no athleticism. He’s just a body in there.

Back to the OP - is there a difference between a bad player or a good player that consistently puts in bad performances?

He certainly won’t be missed and he should be reasonably easy to replace.

January 29, 2018, 08:47:21 PM
Reply #2


On the Sky Sports yellow bar now. £20m to West Ham would get us out of a massive hole with a player who is neither use nor ornament at the minute and make a decent sized dent in the wage bill too.
Agreed. Imagine a 33 year old Schneiderlein loping around our midfield! Major let-off.

January 29, 2018, 10:24:55 PM
Reply #3


Wouldn't be such a bad move to try Sigurdsson in Schneiderlin's place with the protection of Gueye next to him, if the move comes off. I think he could make a pretty decent midfielder and extend his career there. He's never a £45m one but we are where we are.
I remember Chelsea having Matic and Fabregas as their 2 ‘defensive’ midfielders. Had a nice balance to it.
Gylfi certainly has the fitness and passing ability for that role.

January 29, 2018, 11:39:34 PM
Reply #4


Talk that WHU have offered to take him on loan but we’ll only sell.