The NSNO Everton Forums

blueforyou wrote: ↑Sun Aug 31, 2025 6:59 pm Jackolenko

More likely, though...

Aznouish

Oh Jackolenko is gooood.

Good to see this lad back against Wolves, I like him a lot. Showed some good linkup play with Grealish. I wonder if anyone’s got an awkward combo name for these two yet a la Bainaar?

Mykish? Grealenko?

He’s way down the Peckham order now so nowt to worry about. He’s gonna play a few cup games and some sub appearances and then get sold. Amazing how he was our best attacking threat not so long ago. Yeah, not long til he’s doing the Lambeth walk of shame out of here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Garner has impressed me in this game. Slowly growing in stature.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Time is flying, it's ace on here. Thanks to everyone who runs the site, it's a lovely and funny and educational place!

Sorry folks.

I was drawn in by the headline, but there’s not much substance to the text. https://sportviewers.com/2025/02/02/leeds-united-star-winger-jack-harrison-joins-fulham-on-a-loan-deal-from-everton-fc/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1T6R2GMoPPeUUlW9blHDsRFsOp5bC0QYxWw-LU97JaBojJrH9-mwIggJ4_aem_J5Xms1ig4SMs7Ne...

I just read that Jack Harrison has been loaned to Fulham.

Anyone mentioned Chilwell for left back yet? Certainly need some competition in that position. Mykolenko divides opinion on here, is Chilwell an upgrade?

Really pleased for this lad today. His reaction and interviews showed how much it means. There’s some passion there.

We’re surely going two up top then with Ndiaye being considered a wide option? Otherwise I don’t see the point of having four strikers of a similar ability level Was thinking exactly this. 4-4-2 or 4-4-1-1 featuring two of our forwards. Chermiti seems to have made real progress before his injury an...

Pisses me off that it is just PL stats. I know, I know, that’s coz it’s PL posting it. Still pisses me off. Also pisses me off that almost all of the footballing honours that make me proud of this club belong to a bygone era which most people find irrelevant these days. Could not agree more. There'...

Goaljira wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 12:24 pm Thats because the loans are for the stadium building.

Not what I’ve read. It was to pay wages towards the end of the season just gone. Truly worried.

In theory the £600m loans isn’t worrying or surprising - the stadium is worth more than that and the majority of those loans will be able to be renegotiated to long term loans backed by the stadium. It’s like when you buy your first house, it’s terrifying that you suddenly owe somebody hundreds of ...

So that’s £200m loans we owe to each of Friedkin, 777, and Fortress? At what point does £600m become a very real worry, especially when potential investors seem to want out as soon as they get involved? Apart from these debts what else are they discovering?