Important points, glad to see them finally addressedTheRam wrote: ↑Wed Jun 04, 2025 11:14 am He’s 35.
Other than offers from the Middle East I don’t see anyone queuing up for him as good as he is.
Dom has been horrendously advised. Demanding 150k a week after you’ve spent the last three years injured and struggling infront of goal was a terrible move.
Now it looks as though we’re his best option. He’d be at newcastle or another bigger club if he didn’t overvalue his worth.
Dominic Calvert-Lewin
Re: Dominic Calvert-Lewin
Re: Dominic Calvert-Lewin
Honestly, that is unbelievable.TheRam wrote: ↑Wed Jun 04, 2025 11:14 am He’s 35.
Other than offers from the Middle East I don’t see anyone queuing up for him as good as he is.
Dom has been horrendously advised. Demanding 150k a week after you’ve spent the last three years injured and struggling infront of goal was a terrible move.
Now it looks as though we’re his best option. He’d be at newcastle or another bigger club if he didn’t overvalue his worth.
He's contributed next to nothing for the best part of 3 years, and him and advisors think he should get a long contract worth 150k a week.
He's deluded if he think he's getting anywhere near that, from anyone.
I really believe we should cut him loose, he's just not reliable injury wise or in front of goal
Re: Dominic Calvert-Lewin
Really good to get all of this down before we hit 100 pages.
Could we cover it again for good measure? Time will tell.
Could we cover it again for good measure? Time will tell.
-
777Kidnappings
- Posts: 2937
- Karma: 1657
Re: Dominic Calvert-Lewin
If it ain't broke777Kidnappings wrote: ↑Wed Jun 04, 2025 8:16 pm Might make 150 pages if you continue to police it with sneery comments
Anyway, what were you saying re: his outlook for a new contract?
- Bob Sacamano
- Posts: 1589
- Karma: 843
-
777Kidnappings
- Posts: 2937
- Karma: 1657
Re: Dominic Calvert-Lewin
I give Dom 2 years with a year extension and Keane 1 year with another year extension. Extension triggers on our terms.
In a world where we need so many additions I think it makes sense to be financially prudent. Replacing them will cost more than renewing, allowing us to spend more on more pressing additions, thus strengthening the squad further.
Sent from my iPhone using NSNO Everton Forums
In a world where we need so many additions I think it makes sense to be financially prudent. Replacing them will cost more than renewing, allowing us to spend more on more pressing additions, thus strengthening the squad further.
Sent from my iPhone using NSNO Everton Forums
-
StirlingBlue
- Posts: 1680
- Karma: 859
Re: Dominic Calvert-Lewin
I’d only resign DCL in a world where we sell Beto.
Neither are good enough to be our first choice but both are too good to be third choice
Neither are good enough to be our first choice but both are too good to be third choice
-
youngysenior
- Posts: 21
- Karma: 17
Re: Dominic Calvert-Lewin
Fuck DCL off, Beto will score loads next season.StirlingBlue wrote:I’d only resign DCL in a world where we sell Beto.
Neither are good enough to be our first choice but both are too good to be third choice
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
-
Bluebridge
- Posts: 1545
- Karma: 856
Re: Dominic Calvert-Lewin
As much as I’ve been a supporter of Dom, I’d keep Beto over him all day long now. Too injury prone and his finishing has declined so much. I’d keep him as back up on seriously reduced/performance related wages, but Beto starts every time if they’re our two main strikers.StirlingBlue wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 6:11 pm I’d only resign DCL in a world where we sell Beto.
Neither are good enough to be our first choice but both are too good to be third choice
Re: Dominic Calvert-Lewin
We can have 3 good strikers mate.StirlingBlue wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 6:11 pm I’d only resign DCL in a world where we sell Beto.
Neither are good enough to be our first choice but both are too good to be third choice
-
777Kidnappings
- Posts: 2937
- Karma: 1657