Didn't the first commission find we were dishonest and the 2nd 1 find we weren't or am I making that up.
Financial Fairplay Investigation - 2025 Nobody in Breach
-
777Kidnappings
- Posts: 3139
- Karma: 1750
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
ur not making it up777Kidnappings wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 3:38 pm Didn't the first commission find we were dishonest and the 2nd 1 find we weren't or am I making that up.
-
sam of the south
- Posts: 1990
- Karma: 1529
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
Surely our silk dude will absolutely go for the fucking throat over this
-
Gorillabear9
- Posts: 52
- Karma: 12
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
I guess Greek heroin importer has more sway than ‘super silk’.
I wish I didn’t love Everton so much because I’m ready to be done with football all together.
I wish I didn’t love Everton so much because I’m ready to be done with football all together.
Last edited by Gorillabear9 on Mon Mar 18, 2024 3:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- NomadskiEFC
- Posts: 1417
- Location: Manchester
- Karma: 785
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
I think the Premier League took the core concept of Numberwang and applied it to their FFP punishment table.
-
Kerryblueboy
- Posts: 2572
- Karma: 712
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
Never mind appealing our own points deduction, we should be appealing Forests to!
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
It's actually way worse than ours, we were £19.5m over on a £105m threshold, they were £34.5m over on a £61m threshold, as a percentage that's a massive breach in comparison to ours.
- NomadskiEFC
- Posts: 1417
- Location: Manchester
- Karma: 785
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
Sooo we are going to be receiving an extra 6 pts for the second breach, to which we will appeal but that won't be settled until after the season has finished?
Is that correct?
Is that correct?
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
Raging, absolutely raging here... So you get less points for going way further over of you provide information honestly, even though the appeal commission said there should be no recourse for supplying wrong info?
So... Erm.. what?!
It wouldn't be so maddening if it was just fucking logical and consistent, but every single time it's made up on the spot without any intelligence.
Watch us now get another 6 points for going less over again that Forest did!
So... Erm.. what?!
It wouldn't be so maddening if it was just fucking logical and consistent, but every single time it's made up on the spot without any intelligence.
Watch us now get another 6 points for going less over again that Forest did!
-
Gorillabear9
- Posts: 52
- Karma: 12
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
Depends on the amount I think. If it’s roughly the same as the first one it should be 3 pts (unless they consider double jeopardy a mitigating factor) or if it’s closer to forests loss then it could be 6 before any mitigating factors. I could be wrong but I don’t think we know the amount of the breach for the period in questionNomadskiEFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 4:25 pm Sooo we are going to be receiving an extra 6 pts for the second breach, to which we will appeal but that won't be settled until after the season has finished?
Is that correct?
Re: Financial Fairplay Investigation - 4 Points Back
So when do we hear about the punishment for the second charge ?