Evertonian in NC wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2024 5:01 pm
So long as there is as absolute certainty that Dyche coaches out his contract, and nothing more. I'd rather a slow, measured process than a hasty one that ends up with someone "famous."
Yeah we need to have a sensible process with a long term vision. It's why I don't want Dyche to be sacked any time soon because we just end up with Moyes on a 3 year deal if that happens.
Obviously if it comes to it and we have to sack Dyche mid season so be it, but we need to do what we can to get through this year without panicking and hamstringing ourselves moving forward.
When the next appointment comes we’ll have to hold our nerve. To move us away from the Burnley Reserves team we currently are and towards a competitive, exciting squad will take many windows and a lot of money.
The next part of the project should be a long term vision, not an impact manager.
Toddacelli wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2024 6:59 pm
When the next appointment comes we’ll have to hold our nerve. To move us away from the Burnley Reserves team we currently are and towards a competitive, exciting squad will take many windows and a lot of money.
The next part of the project should be a long term vision, not an impact manager.
Fully on board giving the next semi-progressive "project" manager at least 3 seasons before I start moaning*.
*knew this to be a complete lie as soon as I finished the sentence
"The best you can hope for is to die in your sleep." - Kenny Rogers (plausible Evertonian)
My stance on replacing Dyche with Moyes is the same as my stance on relationships. NEVER GO BACK!
There's a reason why you parted in the first place. It's like having a second cup of tea. It's never quite as good as the first time around. Savour the memories of the good times, but realise that it's never going to be the same second time around.
Our most successful manager of all time, Howard Kendall. He had three bites at it. First time was wonderful, but second and third times? It just doesn't work!
Dyche does.need fucking off. No doubt about it. But if we are going to part ways, at least think outside the box a little and appoint someone with fresh ideas.
I think it makes sense to have identified others should they sack the current manager, better than sacking, flapping around for a few months and trying to decide on two managers with completely different styles of play.
Don’t get the call for potter at all. When at Brighton he had a team that was responsible for player purchases and DOF who basically organised all things football. He had a good season with good players but Towards the end of his tenure he was getting slated by fans for his negative style of play and limitations. He then goes to Chelsea and couldn’t get a tune out of a Stradivarius subsequently got sacked. Done nowt now for what near on 2 years ?
And he’s lauded as a saviour of a club with players most teams wouldn’t touch with bargepole….
We should be looking at what Newcastle have done after their takeover.
Howe wasn’t the sexiest appointment but he has a defined way of playing and they bought players that suit it, they also have stuck with him way longer than a lot of new owners do.
I’m worried because Mourinho will probably get sacked in the next few months and Friedkin have hired him before
StirlingBlue wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2024 1:42 pm
We should be looking at what Newcastle have done after their takeover.
Howe wasn’t the sexiest appointment but he has a defined way of playing and they bought players that suit it, they also have stuck with him way longer than a lot of new owners do.
I’m worried because Mourinho will probably get sacked in the next few months and Friedkin have hired him before
Surely he's less likely cos they've hired and sacked him
