The Rebuild

This is the new NSNO Everton forum to discuss the Mighty Blues
OldEnglandToffee
Posts: 240
Karma: 233

Re: The Rebuild

Post

TheRam wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 7:03 pm Can’t have another situation of having four players on loan and having to replace them next summer.

Need to avoid the loan market as much as we can imo.
Great for having a look at players though. Mangala we would have signed I think on how he performed. And Lindstrom was well worth a look. Moyes did it before as well. Yobo arteta as well came on loan originally I think. The loan with option also spreads out payment more for the PSRs
blueToffee
User avatar
Posts: 2597
Karma: 904

Re: The Rebuild

Post

Loan with a reasonable option to buy is really our ideal pathway.

Not going to be an option with a lot of targets though.
Shogun
User avatar
Posts: 11433
Karma: 8487

Re: The Rebuild

Post

Even though they're a horrible club and I wouldn't want to be doing a thing with them, wouldn't be surprised if we forked out £30m for Doak
Goaljira
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Karma: 1282

Re: The Rebuild

Post

Shogun wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 6:04 pm "Jack, do you want to come back and play with Jack?"
Jack-Jack_Attack_poster.jpg
Jack-Jack_Attack_poster.jpg (15.03 KiB) Viewed 4120 times
777Kidnappings
Posts: 3016
Karma: 1687

Re: The Rebuild

Post

TheRam wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 7:03 pm Can’t have another situation of having four players on loan and having to replace them next summer.

Need to avoid the loan market as much as we can imo.
Think we'll get loans on obligations to buy. Seems to be a nee thing for a lot of teams
kramer
Posts: 1372
Karma: 1542

Re: The Rebuild

Post

Shogun wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 7:37 pm Even though they're a horrible club and I wouldn't want to be doing a thing with them, wouldn't be surprised if we forked out £30m for Doak
Would love to have him.

Maybe not for quite that much though.
blueToffee
User avatar
Posts: 2597
Karma: 904

Re: The Rebuild

Post

He looks a decent player, current playing club aside Doak has a had a couple of long term injuries he's come back from already.

5 months out with a thigh injury and 7 months with a knee injury, both requiring surgery. For a 19 year old that feels a lot, plus for a club like us it's hard to manage players who might be frequently on the sidelines as our depth is a lot smaller.

I could look past the current club but I'd swerve based on the injuries. Also, price does seem up there again.
The Doc
Posts: 1362
Karma: 890

Re: The Rebuild

Post

My money is still on Dibling.
cassius
User avatar
Posts: 940
Location: Your mum
Karma: 767

Re: The Rebuild

Post

Interesting that Fellows was linked heavily earlier on in the window but has gone dead quiet as possible Dibling alternatives.

Either because we're not interested anymore/at all or because he' was always a last minute option for squad depth.

I don't actually rate Fellows, from what I've seen of him. He's a bit of a one trick pony, but the Albion fans love him so he must have something.
Bluedylan1
Posts: 4175
Karma: 4747

Re: The Rebuild

Post

We could've had Fellows in January, and the same all summer for much less money than Dibling etc, so assuming that Moyes and/or others in the recruitment team don't rate him that much.

Also not really seen other clubs linked too much with him, so again you have to ask the question why, given how prized young, talented domestic players are.
777Kidnappings
Posts: 3016
Karma: 1687

Re: The Rebuild

Post

The Doc wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:01 pm My money is still on Dibling.
Saw something that said eze for 60m to spurs. That deal makes dibling at 45 plus 25% look absolutely outlandish
Stumpy
Posts: 745
Karma: 387

Re: The Rebuild

Post

777Kidnappings wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:56 pm Saw something that said eze for 60m to spurs. That deal makes dibling at 45 plus 25% look absolutely outlandish
Exactly, it's laughable what they are asking for him
blueToffee
User avatar
Posts: 2597
Karma: 904

Re: The Rebuild

Post

777Kidnappings wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:56 pm Saw something that said eze for 60m to spurs. That deal makes dibling at 45 plus 25% look absolutely outlandish
That’s the problem with the deal, as we saw with Richarlison if you pay a lot up front then there really isn’t much room for profit as the going rate for a decent proven winger is 50-60 ish unless they’re literally above and beyond world class (say someone like Bale).

That seems the way it is though, the by far biggest price bump is the price when selling for potential. After that price kinda plateaus.
blueToffee
User avatar
Posts: 2597
Karma: 904

Re: The Rebuild

Post

Double post
Last edited by blueToffee on Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
superpull
Posts: 1329
Karma: 1133

Re: The Rebuild

Post

TheRam wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 7:03 pm Can’t have another situation of having four players on loan and having to replace them next summer.

Need to avoid the loan market as much as we can imo.
Nah, there was too much to do this window to take this stance.

Next year? Absolutely. Move back to the loan markets during January to test a few of the maybes out.

But this year it's 'by any means necessary'
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic