The NSNO Everton Forums

Yep and they play them next too ....

Shogun wrote: ↑Sun Jan 25, 2026 3:20 pm Never is that a handball in the Chelsea match. Absolute joke.

Missed this yesterday but: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/ar ... 47jp7zqw4o (Funny, if it was one of the 'big 6' wronged then I'd have heard about it within a second)

Chelsea VAR penalty at Crystal Palace a mistake, panel says

Chelsea should not have been awarded a penalty for handball in their 3-1 win at Crystal Palace last month, the Premier League's Key Match Incidents (KMI) Panel has said.

With Chelsea leading 2-0, Palace defender Jaydee Canvot blocked Joao Pedro's goal-bound shot with his arm.

Referee Darren England allowed play to continue but was sent to the pitchside monitor by the video assistant referee (VAR), Matt Donohue.

England watched replays on the screen for almost two minutes, and BBC Sport understands he took a lot of persuading.

The five members of the KMI Panel unanimously voted that the original on-field decision was correct and it was a mistake for the VAR to intervene.

It can be a confusing area of law.

The Ifab expressly says that an arm stopping the ball from entering the goal should not automatically be a penalty. There has to be a handball offence.

Yet in its briefings, Uefa has told referees it always expects a spot-kick.

In the Premier League, officials are told to have some discretion over arm position.

The KMI Panel felt the VAR intervention was incorrect because Canvot "is not making his body unnaturally bigger" and that there was a "small deflection off the hip".

It added: "The VAR intervention and final outcome after the on-field review, which resulted in a penalty and yellow card for a non-deliberate handball offence that denied an obvious goal, was considered to be incorrect."

Yet on Saturday, Newcastle conceded a penalty against Brentford, given on-field by referee Andy Madley, for handball by Jacob Murphy.

It was very similar in nature. A shot on target, stopped by an arm quite close to the body.

However, the Brentford penalty is likely to be judged to be a correct decision.

The Murphy handball had no deflection on to the arm, he was facing the shot and appeared to move his arm into the path of the ball in a non-deliberate way.

You can understand why fans might struggle to see the difference.

The Murphy one was stupid as well because whilst he's moved his hand towards the path of the ball he was only doing so because he was trying to pull his arm to his side so as not to be penalised for an unnatural position.

They just need to go back to it being a clear deliberate handball, just waaaaay to much interpretation going on with these rules.

See Eddie Howe trying the no striker approach again tonight.
Let's hope for his sake it goes better than the last time he tried it against the shite

Hahahaha Leicester

Reckon that's that for Frank?

Gutting for West Ham that.

Jammy mancs

Shame West Ham didn't win. Forest going down would taste incredibly sweet and Spurs would just be absolutely hilarious. They have clearly turned a corner though and would not be surprised if they do pull themselves out of it.

Frank must be a gonner. NLD next at Spurs, he'd struggle to make it out alive with another defeat.

Just seen the Newcastle offside. Does that 5cm rule only apply to Liverpool then?

Watched it last night too, Jesus it was the length of his hair that was given off. Even our game we didn't even get to see lines or the automated system in a play. Both players looked offside.

Shogun wrote: ↑Tue Feb 10, 2026 11:33 pm Just seen the Newcastle offside. Does that 5cm rule only apply to Liverpool then?

Casemiro's goal against West Ham in the second half was pretty much the same. About as level as he could be.

Making it up as they go along again.

Trying the multi view here, even though I can't say I'm super bothered about the games tonight.

Hoping Man City win to keep it interesting at the top. Hoping Wolves don't capitulate too for similar reasons at the bottom.

Forest just missing a 6 on 1 chance