Funny way to say TL;DRUnsyisaRhino wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:06 pm Lovely bit of fan fiction but its bordering on masochist porn in places.
I'd give it a 2.5 on good reads.
David Moyes
-
dazfrancis
- Posts: 52
- Karma: 72
Re: David Moyes
-
UnsyisaRhino
- Posts: 665
- Karma: 456
Re: David Moyes
Oh that's not fair, I read the whole thing.
It was very depressing but thankfully, not based on reality. Lots of perhaps/probably/maybe/obviously type vibes, but it's a nice theory.
-
Cereal Killer
- Posts: 2508
- Karma: 837
Re: David Moyes
Evertonian418 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 12:49 pm I've said it before and I'll say it again TFG aren't bothered about the club they wanted Bramley Moor as an events arena the club just happened to be attached. Take the size of the Everton crests against the Hill Dickinson name Thats where it should say Everton Football Club not Hill Dickinson Stadium

-
sam of the south
- Posts: 1863
- Karma: 1430
-
Evertonian418
- Posts: 670
- Karma: 172
-
blueforyou
- Posts: 1289
- Karma: 222
Re: David Moyes
Moyes is coming across a bit like that - disgruntled, dissatisfied, disillusioned
Blowing his mind
Blowing his mind
"And you can put that in your ******* black book"
Johnny "retaliate before tackled" Morrissey
BlueMyMind
Johnny "retaliate before tackled" Morrissey
BlueMyMind
-
Evertonian418
- Posts: 670
- Karma: 172
Re: David Moyes
Promises to him maybe failing to materialise.blueforyou wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:11 pm Moyes is coming across a bit like that - disgruntled, dissatisfied, disillusioned
Blowing his mind
-
blueforyou
- Posts: 1289
- Karma: 222
Re: David Moyes
Something seems amiss - big time
"And you can put that in your ******* black book"
Johnny "retaliate before tackled" Morrissey
BlueMyMind
Johnny "retaliate before tackled" Morrissey
BlueMyMind
Re: David Moyes
I don't agree with the negativity towards Moyes, he's been left in the lurch big time as it stands, huge gaps not just in the squad but in the starting 11.
What other team could he have picked yesterday? McNeil left wingback, Garner right... Barry up front. There wasn't an obvious competent team that he refused to pick.
What other team could he have picked yesterday? McNeil left wingback, Garner right... Barry up front. There wasn't an obvious competent team that he refused to pick.
-
UnsyisaRhino
- Posts: 665
- Karma: 456
Re: David Moyes
Not sure it was all tactics, you could see the players getting frustrated with the negativity, especially with the passes coming out from the back four. Part of it has to lie with the players, Keane & Garner played super safe all night and O'Brien was probably the worst we've seen him on the ball.
Re: David Moyes
Hence why I was critical of Keane for going back to pickford when he could have played a simple pass to Grealish to keep building a move.UnsyisaRhino wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:43 pm Not sure it was all tactics, you could see the players getting frustrated with the negativity, especially with the passes coming out from the back four. Part of it has to lie with the players, Keane & Garner played super safe all night and O'Brien was probably the worst we've seen him on the ball.
-
Paddockoldie
- Posts: 1405
- Karma: 685
Re: David Moyes
That would be very worrying because Moyes would have wanted reassurance of what he'd get for taking the job. So, our owners would be shysters... Only Ev..... leave it
Re: David Moyes
Passing networks were entirely fucked.
I think we’d have been fully in the shit with a back three/five. Overloading that area further wouldn’t have helped us progress the ball.
Moyes had two reasonable choices - Garner at LB, Tim to CM or McNeil at LB, Garner to DM. He sort of made the former (I think letting Tim stay deepest was a mistake, we only functioned when he and Gana switched). The latter would have been better for passing out of the back BUT McNeil has no experience that I know of playing in a back four and holding a line while Garner does. Moyes did exactly what I’d expect and went with the more experienced defender. Probably helped his choice that McNeil had a greater chance of struggling with James’ pace.
Obviously the choice he made messed up our passing from the back and left us in the shit for long stretches. Get this man the four extra players he needs so we never have to play Tim or start Charly again. I can’t fault the LB situation too much, we have two naturals and both were unavailable. Even Branthwaite would’ve done better in build ups than Garner (not a knock on him, it’s a horribly unnatural position for him).
I think we’d have been fully in the shit with a back three/five. Overloading that area further wouldn’t have helped us progress the ball.
Moyes had two reasonable choices - Garner at LB, Tim to CM or McNeil at LB, Garner to DM. He sort of made the former (I think letting Tim stay deepest was a mistake, we only functioned when he and Gana switched). The latter would have been better for passing out of the back BUT McNeil has no experience that I know of playing in a back four and holding a line while Garner does. Moyes did exactly what I’d expect and went with the more experienced defender. Probably helped his choice that McNeil had a greater chance of struggling with James’ pace.
Obviously the choice he made messed up our passing from the back and left us in the shit for long stretches. Get this man the four extra players he needs so we never have to play Tim or start Charly again. I can’t fault the LB situation too much, we have two naturals and both were unavailable. Even Branthwaite would’ve done better in build ups than Garner (not a knock on him, it’s a horribly unnatural position for him).
Re: David Moyes
I’m more critical of how it got as far back as Keane in the first place - we were on the attack then started going backwards for some reason