Not that Moyes would ever go for it.
Pickford
O'Brien Tarkowski Keane
Garner KDH Gana Aznou
Ndiaye Grealish
Barry
David Moyes
-
Cereal Killer
- Posts: 2570
- Karma: 870
- Toddacelli
- Posts: 1826
- Karma: 1866
Re: David Moyes
Throwing my hat into the ring…
Pickford
O’Brien Tarky Keane Mykolenko
Garner Gana
Alcaraz
Dibling Ndiaye Grealish
Pickford
O’Brien Tarky Keane Mykolenko
Garner Gana
Alcaraz
Dibling Ndiaye Grealish
-
Bluebridge
- Posts: 1605
- Karma: 883
Re: David Moyes
I’d give that a whirl, wouldn’t be opposed to starting Seamus either, if/when he breaks down then bring big Jake on, we need to try something.Toddacelli wrote: ↑Tue Sep 30, 2025 10:10 pm Throwing my hat into the ring…
Pickford
O’Brien Tarky Keane Mykolenko
Garner Gana
Alcaraz
Dibling Ndiaye Grealish
Re: David Moyes
I see Moyes drooling over Palace's system in the post match interviews, and gets me thinking...
Pickford
O'Brien Tarkowski Keane
Garner Gana KDH Aznou
Ndiaye Barry Grealish
Pickford
O'Brien Tarkowski Keane
Garner Gana KDH Aznou
Ndiaye Barry Grealish
-
Cereal Killer
- Posts: 2570
- Karma: 870
Re: David Moyes
Difference is Palace have a load of pace to make it work and a striker who can hold it up
We don’t have any of that
-
sam of the south
- Posts: 1924
- Karma: 1489
Re: David Moyes
Maybe by seasons end (yep, I’d play Keane instead of Tarkowski right now on form, and I’m hoping that Barry, Dibling, Aznou and Röhl all get chances and make themselves undroppable, although I know it’s unlikely)
Pickford
O’Brien Keane Branthwaite
Dibling Gana Röhl Aznou
Ndiaye Barry Grealish
King, Patterson, Tarkowski, Mykolenko, Iroegbunam, Garner, KDH, Alcaraz, Beto
Re: David Moyes
I like the idea of 3-4-3 until we get modern day full backs in.
Pickford
O’Brien Tarks Branthwaite
Garner Gana Rohl McNeil
N’Diaye Grealish
Beto
Pickford
O’Brien Tarks Branthwaite
Garner Gana Rohl McNeil
N’Diaye Grealish
Beto
-
StirlingBlue
- Posts: 1727
- Karma: 892
Re: David Moyes
If you watch back the game yesterday it wasn't that Mateta was magically holding the ball up, it's that he wasn't under as much pressure from our CBs as they couldn't follow him as we were wary of the threat in behind of Pinot/Sarr/Munoz/Mitchell. Often Matata was receiving the ball with nobody within 5 yards.Cereal Killer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 06, 2025 5:18 am Difference is Palace have a load of pace to make it work and a striker who can hold it up
We don’t have any of that
Compare that to Barry/Beto trying to take in the ball with a defender or two touch tight on them and it's a way harder job. None of our wide options run beyond so opposition defences can just squeeze squeeze squeeze.
I guess my point is that even though Barry/Beto obviously have issues, if you drop Mateta into our lineup yesterday I don't think we look very different.