Michael Keane

This is the new NSNO Everton forum to discuss the Mighty Blues
Audrey Horne
User avatar
Posts: 6443
Location: 53.4389° N - 2.9662° W
Karma: 2611

Re: Michael Keane

Post

Bob Sacamano wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 7:29 am He’s done tremendously but the real winners are the four people that petitioned for his contract extension. Medals are in the post.
:lol:
dazfrancis
Posts: 61
Karma: 83

Re: Michael Keane

Post

Always said he was the best finisher at the club.

That counts, right?
Toddacelli
User avatar
Posts: 1896
Karma: 1917

Re: Michael Keane

Post

dazfrancis wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 11:34 am Always said it was best if he was finished at the club.

That counts, right?
Fixed

Same bro, same!
AjaxAndy
Posts: 4970
Karma: 2304

Re: Michael Keane

Post

Bob Sacamano wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 7:29 am He’s done tremendously but the real winners are the four people that petitioned for his contract extension. Medals are in the post.
Tbf if he'd been shocking there'd be fuck loads saying we shouldn't have re-signed him, so think those few who called it right (for now at least) can fairly mention it.
Audrey Horne
User avatar
Posts: 6443
Location: 53.4389° N - 2.9662° W
Karma: 2611

Re: Michael Keane

Post

🤔
Brownie
Posts: 1020
Karma: 697

Re: Michael Keane

Post

Talent was never in doubt - was always his consistency and his mental toughness. I still count his last minute screamer against Spurs as being one of the best feelings I’ve had at a game. Keep it up big Mike
Toddacelli
User avatar
Posts: 1896
Karma: 1917

Re: Michael Keane

Post

Yep it’s reliability. Good in spells, would hate to have to rely on him. Current spell - very good. Long may it continue. His shirt till he loses it.
Fynci
Posts: 466
Karma: 312

Re: Michael Keane

Post

Bob Sacamano wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 7:29 am He’s done tremendously but the real winners are the four people that petitioned for his contract extension. Medals are in the post.
Fynci wrote: Fri Jul 04, 2025 6:13 pm Weird feeling, I'm happy that he's sticking around while also hoping that he doesn't have to play.
I want half a medal, at the very least.
Bob Sacamano
User avatar
Posts: 1704
Karma: 890

Re: Michael Keane

Post

AjaxAndy wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 1:58 pm Tbf if he'd been shocking there'd be fuck loads saying we shouldn't have re-signed him, so think those few who called it right (for now at least) can fairly mention it.
lol calm down
cassius
User avatar
Posts: 960
Location: Your mum
Karma: 773

Re: Michael Keane

Post

I'm really happy for Keggers, he seems like a good guy and it's nice to see him playing with a smile on his ruddy cheeked face.
TheRam
Posts: 6598
Karma: 6724

Re: Michael Keane

Post

The forum dickhead went all round the forum looking for aggro after the game as per.

That’s all it was. Keane has been very good this season, it’s been said by pretty much everyone on the forum.
Audrey Horne
User avatar
Posts: 6443
Location: 53.4389° N - 2.9662° W
Karma: 2611

Re: Michael Keane

Post

TheRam wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 3:59 pm The forum dickhead went all round the forum looking for aggro after the game as per.

That’s all it was. Keane has been very good this season, it’s been said by pretty much everyone on the forum.
Yeah it's pretty relentless and sad really.
Escalator
Posts: 3177
Karma: 1045

Re: Michael Keane

Post

TheRam wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 3:59 pm The forum dickhead went all round the forum looking for aggro after the game as per.

That’s all it was. Keane has been very good this season, it’s been said by pretty much everyone on the forum.
That’s absolute bollocks, how do you reckon I was looking for aggro ? I made a statement, am allowed to do that no ? Was an observation, was factual, no need for your nastiness.
Escalator
Posts: 3177
Karma: 1045

Re: Michael Keane

Post

Audrey Horne wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 4:02 pm Yeah it's pretty relentless and sad really.
Relentless ? Do you have an example ?
AjaxAndy
Posts: 4970
Karma: 2304

Re: Michael Keane

Post

Bob Sacamano wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 3:35 pm lol calm down
I'm perfectly calm mate, just making the point that those against it would have been in full voice if they'd been proven right / if they are eventually proven right. Don't see why there's an issue with the few who backed it doing likewise.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic