James Garner

[Cereal Killer]

[brap2]

Don’t both of these graphs basically illustrate what I’ve said about him?

Quality off the ball
Anonymous on it

[brap2]

Anonymous a bit harsh tbf he’s good he’s just not actually good

[CraigS...]

Anonymous a bit harsh tbf he’s good he’s just not actually good

You at it again ffs

[AjaxAndy]

How many 6s are amazing on the ball in terms of forward play?

He's a defensive stat monster, reads the game great and moves the ball around well.

I think an upgrade on that costs you £70m+

I think our issues stem elsewhere not with Garner. Whomever we play alongside him tends not to be a good forward passer, and the full backs offer nothing.

Then our wingers aren't pacy.

So we can neither pass through a team, nor hit them quickly in transition.

Replacing Garner wouldn't rectify those issues.

[brap2]

You at it again ffs

I’ve no idea what you’re talking about, have we spoken before?

[Shogun]

Pretty much the same players as Elliot Anderson based on those graphs then.

Stick a ball playing midfielder next to him and we might be able to work on something.

[TheRam]

Couldn’t care less about a player like garner playing through balls.

Nice if he does, doesn’t matter if he doesn’t.

[brap2]

Yeah every team needs water carrying workhorses

[Shogun]

Yeah every team needs water carrying workhorses

City are about to pay over £100m for the Forest one apparently!

[brap2]

City are about to pay over £100m for the Forest one apparently!

Money well spent