Time and time again I completely forget we still have Alcaraz
Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
The difference is looks ready to play Premier League footie.Gash wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2026 10:08 am You've just said another thread that Patterson should have had a loan years ago, played 35 games a season and been atrociously mismanaged yet you want to do the same with Armstrong rather than loan him out. There's not a chance when everyone is fit that he's playing regular football, he's already wasted half of last season hardly playing, everyone knew that would happen and when he did play he was out of position most of the time.
My post outlined the fact if we sell Tim and Alcaraz and we don’t sign a right back this week we start the season with Rohl there, meaning we have 5 players for 3 midfield positions for the Palace game. But with one out injured and one not yet up to speed, Harrison starts.
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
Branthwaite went on loan twice when he was older than Armstrong and people could see back then he was a huge talent, and injuries aside he'll have benefited massively from it.Bumble wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2026 4:19 pm The difference is looks ready to play Premier League footie.
My post outlined the fact if we sell Tim and Alcaraz and we don’t sign a right back this week we start the season with Rohl there, meaning we have 5 players for 3 midfield positions for the Palace game. But with one out injured and one not yet up to speed, Harrison starts.
Armstrong's season will be decided at the end of the window once they know what ths squad is like, if he doesn't go on loan and sits around getting the odd minutes here and there it'll be a disgrace.
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
I do agree he needs to be playing matches but this lad is well above championship level. Thought he was boss today.
- Lazarou II
- Posts: 2424
- Karma: 1356
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
Hackney said the PL is tougher, Armstrong looks more than capable, we should keep him and play him to accelerate his developement.
We are very lucky to have one of the best prospects in the country.
As long as he isn't shunted onto the wing.
We are very lucky to have one of the best prospects in the country.
As long as he isn't shunted onto the wing.
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
He's really good at progressing the ball forward and quickly. Great on the turn. Throws in good sensible tackles. So much to like.
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
Is he too good to send out on loan?
Seems mad that we’d send out such a good player on loan considering we’re not that good.
I’d keep him. I think he’s good enough to force the manager into giving him decent game time.
He doesn’t need to start every game, but if he could get twenty plus starts I’d say it’s a good season for his development.
Seems mad that we’d send out such a good player on loan considering we’re not that good.
I’d keep him. I think he’s good enough to force the manager into giving him decent game time.
He doesn’t need to start every game, but if he could get twenty plus starts I’d say it’s a good season for his development.
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
100% good enough if he was our only new integration.TheRam wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2026 9:47 pm Is he too good to send out on loan?
Seems mad that we’d send out such a good player on loan considering we’re not that good.
I’d keep him. I think he’s good enough to force the manager into giving him decent game time.
He doesn’t need to start every game, but if he could get twenty plus starts I’d say it’s a good season for his development.
I think the 5 of Nørgaard, Garner, Hackney Armstrong and KDH rotated, depending partly on opposition, or injuries etc, is a great way to have him in.
If he won't get the 20 starts, send him to Europe immediately (can't see anyone in the PL taking him at this stage) with guaranteed minutes, and next year he'll be a guaranteed starter for us.
Great to see how he plays with Tyrique and KDH, and Hackney.
It's maybe a bit of a risk to blood all the kids at once unless its a necessity, like yesterday, which was also a bit of a free hit.
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
I think it depends on if we sign a right back, as I don't think we can give enough minutes to Rohl, Armstrong and Hackney in CM.TheRam wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2026 9:47 pm Is he too good to send out on loan?
Seems mad that we’d send out such a good player on loan considering we’re not that good.
I’d keep him. I think he’s good enough to force the manager into giving him decent game time.
He doesn’t need to start every game, but if he could get twenty plus starts I’d say it’s a good season for his development.
Would be a shame to send him out on loan when he looks ready, but Rohl also looks ready, yet both are behind Hackney in the pecking order, and he's probably not first choice to start either.
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
Definitely keep him.
Before Garner and Norgaard are fully up to speed he’ll get half a dozen starts and that’s before injuries, suspensions, form fluctuations etc…
If we start well and he starts well the shirt is his to lose and if it pushes them all to play better and get on the scoresheet more often to keep their place then so be it.
Before Garner and Norgaard are fully up to speed he’ll get half a dozen starts and that’s before injuries, suspensions, form fluctuations etc…
If we start well and he starts well the shirt is his to lose and if it pushes them all to play better and get on the scoresheet more often to keep their place then so be it.
-
Toddacelli
- Posts: 2764
- Karma: 2934
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
Only saw MOTD highlights but it felt like a very youthful energy in the team on Saturday. It was nice to have and there didn’t seem to be any fear in the young players either. I think Moyes’ teams can be restrained, cautious, pragmatic- but it looked like there was a bit more ‘go for it’ in the players than usual. Could be new start, excitement, youth or even Moyes’ coaching and instructions for this one but it felt good.
-
StirlingBlue
- Posts: 2453
- Karma: 1392
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
I think the double pivot midfield spots are for Garner, Norgaard, Hackney and Tim.
The CAM spot is KDH with backup from Alcaraz.
If we sell Alcaraz then Armstrong can take that spot whilst providing cover for the pivot too.
However, if we sign an actual RB then I think Rohl gets the KDH backup ahead of Armstrong and we should send him out on loan
The CAM spot is KDH with backup from Alcaraz.
If we sell Alcaraz then Armstrong can take that spot whilst providing cover for the pivot too.
However, if we sign an actual RB then I think Rohl gets the KDH backup ahead of Armstrong and we should send him out on loan
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
Alcaraz should depart this week. I really don't see the point in having him around if we are well stocked in the middle and his contract is running down this season.
Realise some value in him if we can and open up his minutes to Armstrong and Hackney.
Realise some value in him if we can and open up his minutes to Armstrong and Hackney.
Re: Future Captain Harrison Armstrong
Bumble wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2026 6:31 am Definitely keep him.
Before Garner and Norgaard are fully up to speed he’ll get half a dozen starts and that’s before injuries, suspensions, form fluctuations etc…
If we start well and he starts well the shirt is his to lose and if it pushes them all to play better and get on the scoresheet more often to keep their place then so be it.
I agree with the sentiment, but one of Moyes' blind spots is his loyalty to his generals. Garner comes back in for Armstrong the second he is fully fit (assuming he wasn't 100% on Saturday or he would have started).
Hackney has a chance of keeping Norgaard out for a bit, possibly.