Richarlison
- Posts: 3121
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 2:00 am
- Location: California Love
- Karma: 1239
Re: Richarlison
If it’s 35m for a player spurs don’t want, in the final year of his contract, we’ve just had our pants pulled down. AND we’ve also sold them our best player at a low ball figure.
This fucking club.
This fucking club.
- Posts: 4022
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2023 6:34 pm
- Karma: 1278
Re: Richarlison
Just for context arsenal selling Jesus to Barca in final year of his contract for 10 million so if it’s 35 million we have been had
- Posts: 1238
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2023 6:21 pm
- Karma: 647
Re: Richarlison
£35m or not, it all comes back to the same thing; we need money and Spurs are dictating things.
- Posts: 1851
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 4:33 pm
- Karma: 353
Re: Richarlison
Good deal for Spurs
"And you can put that in your ******* black book"
Johnny "retaliate before tackled" Morrissey
BlueMyMind
Johnny "retaliate before tackled" Morrissey
BlueMyMind
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 7:36 pm
- Karma: 2099
Re: Richarlison
Genuinely seen this a couple of times but what is this supposition based on?Granite wrote: Sun Aug 30, 2026 2:15 pm £35m or not, it all comes back to the same thing; we need money and Spurs are dictating things.
If it’s because we’re getting a bad deal on Richarlison, I think there is enough evidence to say we’re capable of doing that without anyone putting our feet to the fire.
If we just needed money, we could sell Richarlison at a cut price and clearly there has been interest from a good number of teams. Also if we needed money we shouldn’t be buying Grealish or Tete etc. if the club came out and said we’re taking the wedge on Armstrong because otherwise it’s a points deduction, which seems to be your implication with the Richarlison/Spurs deal then I imagine as unpleasant as that would be fans would get it. Rather than sell another prized asset on the cheap and add another expensive aging player to the books and add to any financial mess.
Could it not just be as simple as we’re selling a player who wants to go, and scrambling for a striker like we are for an RB again. Because incompetence.
- Posts: 2261
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 5:02 pm
- Karma: 1330
- Posts: 1815
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 5:09 pm
- Karma: 1632
Re: Richarlison
I thought the deals weren't related 
Really is just a load of bullshit, this transfer rumour nonsense isn't it
Really is just a load of bullshit, this transfer rumour nonsense isn't it
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 11:36 pm
- Karma: 499
- Posts: 5187
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2023 7:35 pm
- Karma: 2888
- Posts: 4022
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2023 6:34 pm
- Karma: 1278
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2025 12:31 pm
- Karma: 906
Re: Richarlison
Last big contract. He would have to take a paycut to join us and I wouldn't take a pay cut to move jobs so I don't blame him.
Move on. I'd even look look at Nwaneri at Arsenal who they seem desperate to offload for a season.
Move on. I'd even look look at Nwaneri at Arsenal who they seem desperate to offload for a season.
- Posts: 1238
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2023 6:21 pm
- Karma: 647
Re: Richarlison
I’m my opinion the “£35m” for Richy is baked into the Illy deal. We sell Illy to a different club, say City for £60m,
I don’t see us have £35m to spend on a forward.
I don’t see us have £35m to spend on a forward.
- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 6:17 pm
- Karma: 592
Re: Richarlison
I'm the same, i just can't see why illy would want to go there, unless of course they're offering stupid money
- Posts: 5187
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2023 7:35 pm
- Karma: 2888
Re: Richarlison
Surely thats not right. If it was baked into the illy deal it would suggest the 60 for him was inflatedGranite wrote: Mon Aug 31, 2026 4:32 pm I’m my opinion the “£35m” for Richy is baked into the Illy deal. We sell Illy to a different club, say City for £60m,
I don’t see us have £35m to spend on a forward.