Why? It's an opinion
Patterson Future
-
Paddockoldie
- Posts: 1405
- Karma: 685
-
Paddockoldie
- Posts: 1405
- Karma: 685
Re: Patterson Future
Attacking wise he's decent with a good cross. If defence is his weakness then play his strengths and at least he'll understand the RB position to help cover it. Garner can play there better than midfield imo
Re: Patterson Future
Thought it was a decent little cameo, didn't have much to do defensively and the one time he did he won the ball back and cleared it. Two or three good crosses too and you think if him and Lindstrom got games together they could build up a bit of an understanding.
Probably back to third choice next week once Coleman's fit though.
Probably back to third choice next week once Coleman's fit though.
Re: Patterson Future
Even if he's shite he's quick and shite which is better than what we have. Baffles me he isn't at least getting sub minutes given how shit we are at full back
Re: Patterson Future
He showed his signs, but he had the freedom to do so. Forest had the game wrapped up and just sat deep so he could get forward, so it's hard to read too much into it. What he did do going forward was decent, but I expect Dyche will put more on the bit where he fucked up as last man that nearly cost a goal
-
blueforyou
- Posts: 1289
- Karma: 222
Re: Patterson Future
Wide right: Harrison, no; Lindstrom, no; Patto, in
"And you can put that in your ******* black book"
Johnny "retaliate before tackled" Morrissey
BlueMyMind
Johnny "retaliate before tackled" Morrissey
BlueMyMind
- Audrey Horne
- Posts: 5986
- Location: 53.4389° N - 2.9662° W
- Karma: 2464
Re: Patterson Future
Yeah did well i thought.Gash wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 7:12 pm Thought it was a decent little cameo, didn't have much to do defensively and the one time he did he won the ball back and cleared it. Two or three good crosses too and you think if him and Lindstrom got games together they could build up a bit of an understanding.
Probably back to third choice next week once Coleman's fit though.
Put young at LB, Patterson at RB and Lindstrom in place of Harrison.
Re: Patterson Future
Think it just makes a massive difference having a player who’s willing to run beyond in that position.
Young can’t do that, which makes even more sense to put him at left back as he can just sit deep and offer some quality playing out.
If you’re worried about the space your wing back will leave then sit Gana there to cover. It’s basic stuff.
Young can’t do that, which makes even more sense to put him at left back as he can just sit deep and offer some quality playing out.
If you’re worried about the space your wing back will leave then sit Gana there to cover. It’s basic stuff.
Re: Patterson Future
It was nice to watch a natural attacking fullback for a bit.
You need at least one when you cross as much as we do.
You need at least one when you cross as much as we do.
Re: Patterson Future
Think he's got the perfect manager for him there. Remember how ropey Coleman was in that position despite his obvious attacking talent? Moyes couldn't have dealt with his development any better and I think he'll give Patterson every opportunity to become good enough to start RB for us.
Re: Patterson Future
I remember Coleman playing on the wing for a little bit when he first joined.
I remember Baines not getting a game at first either actually.
I remember Baines not getting a game at first either actually.