James Garner

This is the new NSNO Everton forum to discuss the Mighty Blues
Toddacelli
User avatar
Posts: 1765
Karma: 1805

Re: James Garner

Post

brap2 wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2025 9:59 pm Disagree, but it's okay
This is not the spirit at all.

Fight! Fight! Fight! Fight!
The Doc
Posts: 1318
Karma: 860

Re: James Garner

Post

Far too civilised on here lately. Damn you Moyes.
TheRam
Posts: 6204
Karma: 6309

Re: James Garner

Post

:roll: Last night is the type of game where he’s exposed.

Had the freedom of the park but did absolutely nothing with the ball.

I’ve seen people say he keeps us ticking over but playing square balls for 90 minutes isn’t keeping us ticking over.

Ticking over is playing quick, sharp balls between the lines, progressing us forward, switching the play, turning forwards with the ball.

Saw none of that last night. Took too many touches and everything was a nothing sideways or backwards pass.

He just isn’t it for me.

I think Mangala is a much better player.
Toddacelli
User avatar
Posts: 1765
Karma: 1805

Re: James Garner

Post

Needs to watch the video of his own through ball on repeat. Needs to be braver.
Silas
User avatar
Posts: 1339
Karma: 896

Re: James Garner

Post

TheRam wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 5:48 am :roll: Last night is the type of game where he’s exposed.

Had the freedom of the park but did absolutely nothing with the ball.

I’ve seen people say he keeps us ticking over but playing square balls for 90 minutes isn’t keeping us ticking over.

Ticking over is playing quick, sharp balls between the lines, progressing us forward, switching the play, turning forwards with the ball.

Saw none of that last night. Took too many touches and everything was a nothing sideways or backwards pass.

He just isn’t it for me.

I think Mangala is a much better player.
He plays safe too often for sure, like a more cultured James MC Carthy. Think there's a player in there but not sure what player he is trying to be at times. Still think we are much better when he plays than we don't as a rule though
AjaxAndy
Posts: 4751
Karma: 2166

Re: James Garner

Post

He did try a couple of longish range through balls but both were intercepted. It's not easy threading a ball through to a striker if you're playing a deep midfield role. The longer the pass, especially on the floor the more likely it is to be cut out.

Thought he was fine last night tbh, wanted the ball lots and that's important when we're asking the players to play it around on the ground.

He's a largely unspectacular player, seems like he should be better given his ability with his right foot, but I don't think he's quite at a level where you can boss games in the premier league. Don't mind him though, think he's perfectly fine for now.
Granite
Posts: 827
Karma: 386

Re: James Garner

Post

You get what you pay for. £8.5m + add ons. He’s been great value but you’ve got to be paying nearer £35m+ if you want someone who can consistently hurt the opposition from CM, rather than just run around a bit.
TheRam
Posts: 6204
Karma: 6309

Re: James Garner

Post

Can get loads of midfielders better for a lot less than £35m.

Not every single opinion has to come down to money.
brap2
Posts: 4250
Karma: 3958

Re: James Garner

Post

Granite wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 7:17 pm You get what you pay for. £8.5m + add ons. He’s been great value but you’ve got to be paying nearer £35m+ if you want someone who can consistently hurt the opposition from CM, rather than just run around a bit.
Dychean lack of ambition on display here
Granite
Posts: 827
Karma: 386

Re: James Garner

Post

I didn’t buy James Garner, bro
Shogun
User avatar
Posts: 11229
Karma: 8258

Re: James Garner

Post

I've done a 180 on him and think he's decent. There are players like him scattered around all decent teams, think you have to appreciate him for the player he is rather than lament him for something he's not. He's a solid and versatile player who'll be at least a 6/10 every week which is a good thing.
Silas
User avatar
Posts: 1339
Karma: 896

Re: James Garner

Post

Yeah you aren't building a team around him or anything but he's a good player
Jimmywhack
Posts: 432
Location: Deeside Riviera
Karma: 154

Re: James Garner

Post

He is neat and tidy
Still young so could improve
Champagne lifestyle, Lemonade wages
StirlingBlue
Posts: 1680
Karma: 859

Re: James Garner

Post

AjaxAndy wrote:He did try a couple of longish range through balls but both were intercepted. It's not easy threading a ball through to a striker if you're playing a deep midfield role. The longer the pass, especially on the floor the more likely it is to be cut out.
My issue isn’t that he didn’t thread a through ball to the striker, it’s that the easier (but still progressive) passes like crossfield to a forward running fullback or between the lines to Charly/Lindstrom/Harrison were being made more often by both Tarkowski and Branthwaite.

He would drop between the CBs to recycle the ball then wait for them to make the progressive passes
Bluedylan1
Posts: 4158
Karma: 4730

Re: James Garner

Post

StirlingBlue wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2025 12:56 pm My issue isn’t that he didn’t thread a through ball to the striker, it’s that the easier (but still progressive) passes like crossfield to a forward running fullback or between the lines to Charly/Lindstrom/Harrison were being made more often by both Tarkowski and Branthwaite.

He would drop between the CBs to recycle the ball then wait for them to make the progressive passes
Yeah I think you've nailed it.

He gives the ball to more defensive players to take the passing risk that he should be taking more often. That's very irritating and it hurts our build up.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic