Page 96 of 108

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 4:35 pm
by dazfrancis
UnsyisaRhino wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:06 pm Lovely bit of fan fiction but its bordering on masochist porn in places.

I'd give it a 2.5 on good reads.
Funny way to say TL;DR

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 4:43 pm
by UnsyisaRhino
dazfrancis wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 4:35 pm Funny way to say TL;DR
Oh that's not fair, I read the whole thing.

It was very depressing but thankfully, not based on reality. Lots of perhaps/probably/maybe/obviously type vibes, but it's a nice theory.

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 4:52 pm
by Cereal Killer
Evertonian418 wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 12:49 pm I've said it before and I'll say it again TFG aren't bothered about the club they wanted Bramley Moor as an events arena the club just happened to be attached. Take the size of the Everton crests against the Hill Dickinson name Thats where it should say Everton Football Club not Hill Dickinson Stadium
Image

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 5:37 pm
by sam of the south
Audrey Horne wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 2:28 pm https://archive.md/BPlTy
Yup, can’t argue with that.

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 5:40 pm
by Evertonian418
Cereal Killer wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 4:52 pm Image
Love it :D

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:11 pm
by blueforyou
Moyes is coming across a bit like that - disgruntled, dissatisfied, disillusioned

Blowing his mind

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:14 pm
by Evertonian418
blueforyou wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:11 pm Moyes is coming across a bit like that - disgruntled, dissatisfied, disillusioned

Blowing his mind
Promises to him maybe failing to materialise.

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:16 pm
by blueforyou
Something seems amiss - big time

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:24 pm
by The Doc
I don't agree with the negativity towards Moyes, he's been left in the lurch big time as it stands, huge gaps not just in the squad but in the starting 11.

What other team could he have picked yesterday? McNeil left wingback, Garner right... Barry up front. There wasn't an obvious competent team that he refused to pick.

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:33 pm
by Blueski
the tactics were awful with all the backwards passing. not his best day for us

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:43 pm
by UnsyisaRhino
Blueski wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:33 pm the tactics were awful with all the backwards passing. not his best day for us
Not sure it was all tactics, you could see the players getting frustrated with the negativity, especially with the passes coming out from the back four. Part of it has to lie with the players, Keane & Garner played super safe all night and O'Brien was probably the worst we've seen him on the ball.

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:54 pm
by TheRam
UnsyisaRhino wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:43 pm Not sure it was all tactics, you could see the players getting frustrated with the negativity, especially with the passes coming out from the back four. Part of it has to lie with the players, Keane & Garner played super safe all night and O'Brien was probably the worst we've seen him on the ball.
Hence why I was critical of Keane for going back to pickford when he could have played a simple pass to Grealish to keep building a move.

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:09 pm
by Paddockoldie
Evertonian418 wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:14 pm Promises to him maybe failing to materialise.
That would be very worrying because Moyes would have wanted reassurance of what he'd get for taking the job. So, our owners would be shysters... Only Ev..... leave it

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:19 pm
by kramer
Passing networks were entirely fucked.

I think we’d have been fully in the shit with a back three/five. Overloading that area further wouldn’t have helped us progress the ball.

Moyes had two reasonable choices - Garner at LB, Tim to CM or McNeil at LB, Garner to DM. He sort of made the former (I think letting Tim stay deepest was a mistake, we only functioned when he and Gana switched). The latter would have been better for passing out of the back BUT McNeil has no experience that I know of playing in a back four and holding a line while Garner does. Moyes did exactly what I’d expect and went with the more experienced defender. Probably helped his choice that McNeil had a greater chance of struggling with James’ pace.

Obviously the choice he made messed up our passing from the back and left us in the shit for long stretches. Get this man the four extra players he needs so we never have to play Tim or start Charly again. I can’t fault the LB situation too much, we have two naturals and both were unavailable. Even Branthwaite would’ve done better in build ups than Garner (not a knock on him, it’s a horribly unnatural position for him).

Re: David Moyes

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:21 pm
by NickNack
TheRam wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:54 pm Hence why I was critical of Keane for going back to pickford when he could have played a simple pass to Grealish to keep building a move.
I’m more critical of how it got as far back as Keane in the first place - we were on the attack then started going backwards for some reason