Page 97 of 107
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:22 pm
by The Doc
McNeil against the pace of Dan James wouldn't have ended well.
Not having enough players to cover injuries was yesterday's downfall. Leeds absolutely dominated us for an entire half.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:22 pm
by Evertonian418
Paddockoldie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:09 pm
That would be very worrying because Moyes would have wanted reassurance of what he'd get for taking the job. So, our owners would be shysters... Only Ev..... leave it
Nothing about Everton ever surprises me.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:28 pm
by TheRam
NickNack wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:21 pm
I’m more critical of how it got as far back as Keane in the first place - we were on the attack then started going backwards for some reason
Lack of width and runners in behind.
All three attacking midfielders wanting to come towards the ball.
I think an average right winger with pace would make a huge difference. Kind of like Theo Walcott did. He wasn’t great but constantly tested the fullback with his pace in behind.
We don’t have anything like that.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:35 pm
by kramer
TheRam wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:28 pm
Lack of width and runners in behind.
All three attacking midfielders wanting to come towards the ball.
I think an average right winger with pace would make a huge difference. Kind of like Theo Walcott did. He wasn’t great but constantly tested the fullback with his pace in behind.
We don’t have anything like that.
This is the argument against Dibling for me.
We have the back-to-goal ballers to play off the left.
When they win their battle and get the ball inside to KDH or Gana or maybe even Grealish or Ndiaye if they get some time centrally, it would be way more impactful to have a right winger making that outside-in run behind the defense.
Walcott, Lennon, Donovan, Mirallas. Think all four of those players made us more effective by making direct runs to balance out all of the indirect wing play down the left.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:42 pm
by blueToffee
Said it earlier but I'd love another Kanchelskis type in the squad. You have to have some variation and be able mix it up a bit. I'd love to add some pace and an ability to shoot to one of our wings at least.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 9:09 pm
by Stumpy
NickNack wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:21 pm
I’m more critical of how it got as far back as Keane in the first place - we were on the attack then started going backwards for some reason
I watched the game in my mates house and we were exasperated with the number of times the ball landed back with pickford after having the ball well inside leeds half
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 9:13 pm
by AjaxAndy
kramer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:35 pm
This is the argument against Dibling for me.
We have the back-to-goal ballers to play off the left.
When they win their battle and get the ball inside to KDH or Gana or maybe even Grealish or Ndiaye if they get some time centrally, it would be way more impactful to have a right winger making that outside-in run behind the defense.
Walcott, Lennon, Donovan, Mirallas. Think all four of those players made us more effective by making direct runs to balance out all of the indirect wing play down the left.
I don't mind having 3 that can drift in and interlink / rotate positions... BUT if we're doing that we need an attacking RB to supply the width. Can't be having O'Brien as the person attempting that because it ain't gonna work.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 9:13 pm
by dazfrancis
kramer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:35 pm
This is the argument against Dibling for me.
We have the back-to-goal ballers to play off the left.
When they win their battle and get the ball inside to KDH or Gana or maybe even Grealish or Ndiaye if they get some time centrally, it would be way more impactful to have a right winger making that outside-in run behind the defense.
Walcott, Lennon, Donovan, Mirallas. Think all four of those players made us more effective by making direct runs to balance out all of the indirect wing play down the left.
Fatawu looks like he could be that
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 9:16 pm
by AjaxAndy
dazfrancis wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 9:13 pm
Fatawu looks like he could be that
Too risky though, they want top dollar and he's only come back from an ACL recently playing 2 games since I think.
I like the look of him but it's a total dead end unfortunately.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 9:20 pm
by dazfrancis
AjaxAndy wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 9:16 pm
Too risky though, they want top dollar and he's only come back from an ACL recently playing 2 games since I think.
I like the look of him but it's a total dead end unfortunately.
Oh totally agree re. the money they want for him but young pacey RW dribble merchants aren't a species about to go extinct.
There are probably 3 or 4 in France alone who come in and improve this team for <25mil
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 11:11 pm
by Blueski
NickNack wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:21 pm
I’m more critical of how it got as far back as Keane in the first place - we were on the attack then started going backwards for some reason
yeah I agree. I am not a fan of Keane but it isn’t his fault the ball made it back to him. And it seemed as if Moyes was frustrated with it all but he’s the manager and ultimately he has to bear some responsibility.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2025 8:09 am
by sam of the south
The more I reflect on it, to me, we seemed to approach the game like we were facing late 90’s Man United.
A bit over the top on caution, really.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2025 8:14 am
by NickNack
Blueski wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 11:11 pm
yeah I agree. I am not a fan of Keane but it isn’t his fault the ball made it back to him. And it seemed as if Moyes was frustrated with it all but he’s the manager and ultimately he has to bear some responsibility.
Moyes bears all the responsibility for tactics and lack of substitutions of course. Looking back now the anger and disappointment levels have lowered I can see the logic in the game plan while also taking into account the state of the squad / player availability….it was always going to be an intense first game so soak up the inevitable pressure, hit them on the break and try and grab a goal later in the game.
Not sure the atrocious passing or JOB’s poor throw-ins referred to in the Daniel Storey article is all Moyes’ fault, that’s on the players. Most of them were way off it on Monday.
Whatever this transfer committee is, it best get its finger out or it’s going to be another massive struggle this season. We’re short in the areas everyone has mentioned, which we may get away with if everyone’s fit but as we’ve already seen we’re not getting through a season without injuries and we haven’t got a squad capable of covering them.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:32 pm
by Shogun
14 wins, 8 draws and 6 defeats for De Rossi when he took over Roma. Then he drew 1 and lost 3 of his first 4 matches of the following season before the Friedkins sacked him.
Moyes might want to be careful with this transfer stuff.
Re: David Moyes
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:40 pm
by Granite
Shogun wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:32 pm
14 wins, 8 draws and 6 defeats for De Rossi when he took over Roma. Then he drew 1 and lost 3 of his first 4 matches of the following season before the Friedkins sacked him.
Moyes might want to be careful with this transfer stuff.
Conversely, that’s why he’ll want players who can win now.