Re: End of Moshiri - Friedkin Purchase Falls Through
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:58 pm
Stadium's going to be nice an all that but unless you are prepared to pay five times the current ticket prices it won't transform us.
The new start for the NSNO Everton forums
https://www.nsno.co.uk/
Note the comment in the Bloomberg piece from Alexander Bafer also, who appears to have worked with Textor at Lyon also.
Old Trafford is 18% of revenue.Dchans wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:19 am New stadium transforms us financially
The 13% idea surely diesnt take into effect any subsidiary incomes that place will generate, such as the restaurants and hotels in the area as well as concerts and events hosted there too
It’s huge financially- just need to get in there while still being a epl team! Also, paying the debts off which are set at a massive interest rate will push the annual running costs down considerably and allow us to spend more
Pretty simple stuff really
I wouldn't want that cunt near our stadium.
Wouldn't you expect our stadium proportion to be higher than United? They sale about a billion shirts more than us and have loads of bigger revenue streams than us outside of the match day experience, but old Trafford is an issue for them, hence why they're looking to expand/rebuild. But proportionally, I would expect Bramley Moore to generate a larger proportion of our revenue than old Trafford doess United
My crude understanding of the situation is that firstly not all of the debt was associated with BMD, part of it MSP , Rights and Media was for working capital. The Friedkin 200k and the 777 200k will be paid off by Textor if he takes over and for that he receives pro rata Moshiris shares, the remaining shares will be funded by equity finance from Textor partners. In effect, Moshiri will get 400 odd k less than he was hoping for. As I said, crude understanding but something along these lines.TheRam wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 12:09 pm Has the ground really put us in £600m worth of debt though?
Isn’t the debt due to a lot of other reasons as well as the ground?
Terrible recruitment, huge wage bill, loans to keep the club running.
Some of that debt will be paid off with a takeover, most of the rest can be manageable in the long term.
Maybe I’m wrong but I think it’s wildly untrue to say this ground has put us in £600m worth of debt.