Page 16 of 58
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 4:19 am
by OldEnglandToffee
Brownie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 09, 2025 6:34 pm

Talks between Everton and Manchester City are still ongoing and things are going the right way
There is encouragement that he would be receptive to the move
(Source - Dominic King, Daily Mail )
Love the ITK language.
It is possible that it is maybe that something might or might not could be or happen in or above the requisite Friday or beard. But also possibly West Ham or John Hamm
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:41 am
by sam of the south
brap2 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 09, 2025 10:07 pmSwerve it
Audrey Horne wrote: ↑Sun Aug 10, 2025 1:04 am
Get him in please asap
Nsno fam *old forum hug emoji*
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 10:50 am
by Trowel
Friedkins not messing about?
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 10:52 am
by Trowel
Fab still adding nothing
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 10:56 am
by Brownie

Jack Grealish is keen on the Everton project and is waiting for the final conditions between the clubs
(Source - @fabriziorom )
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 10:58 am
by Cereal Killer
Trowel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 10, 2025 10:50 am
Friedkins not messing about?
10 month loan, saves us £2m straight away…
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:01 am
by Shogun
Not believing that, Everton never make any progress at weekends
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:06 am
by Silas
I'm flip flopping about this. We clearly need his quality but prefer long term deals. Get that we aren't getting it all sorted and it's probably unreasonable to expect too much
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:08 am
by brap2
Trowel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 10, 2025 10:50 am
Friedkins not messing about?
Friedkins quite literally messing around. Messing with transfer strategy because they want a headline!
I love jack grealish but this isn't a transfer that moves the needle for us.
Brighton didn't need a headline. Brentford didn't need a headline. Why do we need column inches?
Progress not PR!
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:18 am
by Audrey Horne
Game changer. Get him in.
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:20 am
by Shogun
No question for me. I want to see Grealish playing for Everton at BMD and don't really want or feel the need to think about it much harder than that.
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:26 am
by TheRam
Don’t see us getting anyone better than him so just get it done.
If people are calling KDH a baller then this fella will make heads up explode.
Not into the owners pushing for a player to make a statement though. Is just a bit same old same old at the moment.
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:29 am
by Sir Stealth
Was fairly obvious yesterday that we lacked someone who can take a game by the scruff of its neck, Jack would certainly bring that
Im all in on him personally, and purely for what he will bring to the side rather than him being a statement from the owners
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:30 am
by brap2
He'd be the best player on the pitch by one million miles I just don't know if we'd end up watching a very good player get frustrated
Re: Jack Grealish
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:30 am
by The Doc
brap2 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:08 am
Friedkins quite literally messing around. Messing with transfer strategy because they want a headline!
I love jack grealish but this isn't a transfer that moves the needle for us.
Brighton didn't need a headline. Brentford didn't need a headline. Why do we need column inches?
Progress not PR!
Sorry brap he absolutely does move the needle for us in terms of performance on the pitch.