The NSNO Everton Forums

Toffee1 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 11:58 am

Guess they won’t be wanting Onana then…

Ederson to Saudi apparently

https://www.goal.com/en-ng/lists/cristi ... 829cb863bd

Can see them going for Diogo Costa or someone like that

I think the Ederson stuff is just his agent angling for a pay increase because he's ''only'' on 100k a week. Does seem very low for an integral player in a multi-title winning team. Andre Gomes was on more.

Bluedylan1 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 2:39 pm I think the Ederson stuff is just his agent angling for a pay increase because he's ''only'' on 100k a week. Does seem very low for an integral player in a multi-title winning team. Andre Gomes was on more.

Ortega is a pretty decent replacement for him if he goes though. It's hardly like there will be a massive dip in quality if Ederson does decide to fuck off to Saudi. Not saying Ederson is shit, he's a very decent keeper. More that they already have a more than able replacement at the club.

Good "benchmark" signing this.

United can look at this if they want to low ball us regarding Branthwaite

Is there some angle to the Kilman signing that I’m not seeing?

Even if he continues to be a good player it looks like a massive misuse of money to me.

I support the West Hams of the world spending poorly, mind you.

I really rate Kilman. We paid £25m for Michael Keane and Yerry Mina 5 or so years ago, and Tarkowski was linked to Newcastle for £30m+ a year or two later, so Kilman for £40m seems to just be following that level of pricing.

Maidenhead United picking up £4m sell on fee. Potentially transformational for a non league club that.

Bayern following up £47m for Paulhinha with £60m for Olise. Must be lovely not to have been run by a lunatic and his mates.

CannockPricey wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2024 3:53 pm Maidenhead United picking up £4m sell on fee. Potentially transformational for a non league club that.

I'm sure I read that they had a bigger % but agreed to halve if as Wolves said they couldn't do the deal otherwise.

Either way it's a great example of how sell on clauses can be life savers to some clubs.

cassius wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 4:31 am I'm sure I read that they had a bigger % but agreed to halve if as Wolves said they couldn't do the deal otherwise.

Either way it's a great example of how sell on clauses can be life savers to some clubs.

It is true. The Non League Paper said it was initially 20% but they agreed to 10% which still left them picking up £4m