Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2025 6:34 pm
Can’t get bent over by Southampton.
Stick to our price and big boy them.
Stick to our price and big boy them.
The new start for the NSNO Everton forums
https://www.nsno.co.uk/
At which point we'll owe Southampton 25% on top. It's a ridiculously bad deal for us.
They’re in the driving seat though. Cost of getting back in a prem is massive but the big thing is if they don’t go straight back this year it could be 2 or more years in the championship. Sure they feel like if he stays they go straight back up
We can't pay 50m for a championship player because Southampton think he might get them promoted. They are only in the driving seat if someone is daft enoughOldEnglandToffee wrote: ↑Thu Aug 07, 2025 7:48 pm They’re in the driving seat though. Cost of getting back in a prem is massive but the big thing is if they don’t go straight back this year it could be 2 or more years in the championship. Sure they feel like if he stays they go straight back up
8 or a 10 is interesting. Must be a few years away from that. Glowing reference though.
But if that’s there price then we pay it or walk away. if he takes Southampton up or we buy him then he’s a premier league player as he was last season. standard price for a quality attacker seems to be 60 million plus atm. So with a player his age with so much hype he’s gonna be expensive777Kidnappings wrote: ↑Thu Aug 07, 2025 8:00 pm We can't pay 50m for a championship player because Southampton think he might get them promoted. They are only in the driving seat if someone is daft enough
He got 2 goals and no assists last season. He did very little to suggest he should be a premier league player at this moment in time.OldEnglandToffee wrote: ↑Thu Aug 07, 2025 9:45 pm But if that’s there price then we pay it or walk away. if he takes Southampton up or we buy him then he’s a premier league player as he was last season. standard price for a quality attacker seems to be 60 million plus atm. So with a player his age with so much hype he’s gonna be expensive
Gordon is a good comparison in the sense that there’s no comparison, he had done miles more than dibling has to date (appearances, more goals, many more assists), and at the price they want, which shows it’s a mental priceCozzie wrote: ↑Fri Aug 08, 2025 3:28 am In fairness, we sold Antony Gordon for £45M when he hadn't done an awful lot for us. That was what, 2 years ago?
Young English players always come with a premium.
You're paying for potential and what they might become.
I think their valuation of him is fair but we don't want that 25% sell on tagging on.
It will be done at a compromise I reckon and I'd like to think we won't get shafted.
For that sort of outlay whether he fits is irrelevant because you’d want to be building the team around him to let him flourish in his preferred role and putting the best players to help and compliment him around him. £45M is all-in money.Cods wrote: ↑Fri Aug 08, 2025 4:47 am If we buy for 45m and sell for 95m, another 10m as part of a 25% clause is a reasonable chunk of cash. But then again our current offer compared with opening offer is circa +20m...
Not sure going above 50m as total potential outlay is wise, without proven runs on the board.
He's obviously a player though and would be a statement signing for other young talent which would change our image,... whether he fits is another thing.
Sorry, more meant if he 'clicks' with us. That is, style we play etc.Toddacelli wrote: ↑Fri Aug 08, 2025 4:50 am For that sort of outlay whether he fits is irrelevant because you’d want to be building the team around him to let him flourish in his preferred role and putting the best players to help and compliment him around him. £45M is all-in money.