Re: Thelwell talking strategy
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:40 pm
The new start for the NSNO Everton forums
https://www.nsno.co.uk/
There’s no argument that Bournemouth have been better run than us, I’m just saying Bournemouth live in a constant state of financial restriction due to their size but have still built up a wonderful team and if they can we can’t really use our financial issues of these last few years to be an excuse.
True.NomadskiEFC wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:43 pm There’s no argument that Bournemouth have been better run than us, I’m just saying Bournemouth live in a constant state of financial restriction due to their size but have still built up a wonderful team and if they can we can’t really use our financial issues of these last few years to be an excuse.
I mean the gap between capacities of BMD and GP is bigger than Bournemouth’s home capacity. I’m not over egging our financial status, but vs Bournemouth our yearly income is massive.
The point is you don’t need a massive expenditure to spend wisely and build a team that is stronger than its component parts, and Bournemouth and BHA are two classic examples of it.
My biggest hope with FSG is we can start heading that way.
But these are clubs that have years and years of being well run. This thread is comparing a DoF who was tasked with firefighting to those that are building on solid foundations. Sure, we might generate more money, but at the rate in which we were haemorrhaging that doesn't mean we could spend more.NomadskiEFC wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:43 pm There’s no argument that Bournemouth have been better run than us, I’m just saying Bournemouth live in a constant state of financial restriction due to their size but have still built up a wonderful team and if they can we can’t really use our financial issues of these last few years to be an excuse.
I mean the gap between capacities of BMD and GP is bigger than Bournemouth’s home capacity. I’m not over egging our financial status, but vs Bournemouth our yearly income is massive.
The point is you don’t need a massive expenditure to spend wisely and build a team that is stronger than its component parts, and Bournemouth and BHA are two classic examples of it.
My biggest hope with FSG is we can start heading that way.
£141m v £172mNomadskiEFC wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:43 pm There’s no argument that Bournemouth have been better run than us, I’m just saying Bournemouth live in a constant state of financial restriction due to their size but have still built up a wonderful team and if they can we can’t really use our financial issues of these last few years to be an excuse.
I mean the gap between capacities of BMD and GP is bigger than Bournemouth’s home capacity. I’m not over egging our financial status, but vs Bournemouth our yearly income is massive.
The point is you don’t need a massive expenditure to spend wisely and build a team that is stronger than its component parts, and Bournemouth and BHA are two classic examples of it.
My biggest hope with FSG is we can start heading that way.
this seems to make sense at face value, but the reality is its cash. Bournemouth et al have some, we have/ had none, trying to buy players on klarna when competing with clubs who can put some cash down means we are going to lose out on players to those clubsNomadskiEFC wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:45 pm If Bournemouth can build a solid team up with an income a fraction of ours, then we should be able to as well. Same can apply to Brighton and Hove Albion.
We've done a poor job at recruitment, regardless of the issues behind the scenes.
Players like Beto & Jack Harrison shouldn't be anywhere close to our squad.
You'd think if we're sending out (talented) youngsters to the best clubs for their development then we'd do a lot of due diligence on the state of the club, the manager, style of play, mood around the club, stability, etc. Yet we've just sent him to Derby and they've sacked their manager a couple of days later.
I dunno. We’re both speculating but I don’t think they’d have told us anything negative before a decision was made, even if it was on the table.Shogun wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:13 pm You'd think if we're sending out (talented) youngsters to the best clubs for their development then we'd do a lot of due diligence on the state of the club, the manager, style of play, mood around the club, stability, etc. Yet we've just sent him to Derby and they've sacked their manager a couple of days later.
Don't think it paints the club's player development process in a very positive light.
Probably could have been guessed though? I imagine just looking at where they are in the table and reading Derby fans' reactions to what was going on would have given it away. Warne was being criticized for Dyche-standards of football as well.Toddacelli wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:15 pm I dunno. We’re both speculating but I don’t think they’d have told us anything negative before a decision was made, even if it was on the table.