Page 31 of 47

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:30 am
by Toddacelli
Shogun wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 12:54 pm Think some stuff you're reading on here about him @brap2 is getting lost in translation

Image
Haha! Could do with this little gizmo when we have posters who think they are arguing with each other when actually they’re saying the same thing but in different ways!

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 8:24 am
by superpull
Toddacelli wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:30 am Haha! Could do with this little gizmo when we have posters who think they are arguing with each other when actually they’re saying the same thing but in different ways!

No, you're wrong - it's a tool that would help when people have the same opinion but are arguing about it from different points of view.

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:50 pm
by Cozzie
Absolutely rotten pass there. Rotten.

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:56 pm
by Evertonian418
Not sure about him. Could be wasting money again on a player who at the moment doesn't seem good enough.

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:56 pm
by Shogun
We won't sign him, pretty obvious at this point that Moyes isn't into him. Shame imo but it is what it is, looking forward to Doucoure's new contract!

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:58 pm
by Evertonian418
If he's as good as Zidane says why would he come to Everton.

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:10 pm
by Kerryblueboy
Kinda gone off him fucked up an easy pass today didn’t do much

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:14 pm
by toffee_scot
Yeah, I believe he ain't staying

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:17 pm
by Cozzie
Was such a fucking easy ball too. Held on to it too long when he had better options then spammed the pass.

Still wouldn't he too against him staying. Plenty to work with there but he strikes me as the type who will blow hot and cold.

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:19 pm
by brap2
Shogun wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 12:54 pm Think some stuff you're reading on here about him @brap2 is getting lost in translation

Image
Run this again I'm trying to see something

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:32 pm
by superpull
superpull wrote: Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:59 am No, definitely talking about Alcaraz and his abominably shite decision making when he gets near the opposition area.

But will give him 100% credit for being one of the few players capable and willing to get near the opposition area.
As Kramer said though, if he was able to make that final decision we wouldn't have had a hope of bringing him in.

So it's a gamble for me - can we teach him to lay off a pass when around the box. As it stands he's so desperate to win that it clouds everything he does when it matters most.
Been niggling at me since he started playing.

He wouldn't be here if it was any other way. But he simply can't make the right decision when it matters

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:43 pm
by Cozzie
Today was a bad one. Such a simple pass.

Won't go down well.

Still reckon there's a player in there but yeah,don't reckon Moyes will fancy him.

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:01 pm
by Granite
I got a bit caught up in goalscoring Argie midfielder dreams.

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:47 pm
by AjaxAndy
Got such little time to do stuff on the pitch when he comes on as a late sub. He's a baller who makes things happen and that pass whilst poor isn't really representative of what he can do, we've seen with more time on the pitch and up to speed with a game him slide through passes no one else in the team is capable of.

We need to sign him, I'm fairly certain we will. I'd imagine it's just Moyes being cautious because of we activate his clause and then he gets a serious injury we're stuck with a crocked player.

Re: Carlos Alcaraz

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 7:25 pm
by The Doc
Terrible pass. It's not a deal breaker though.

Was it Doucoure he should have passed to? Anyone else think he hesitated because it was Doucoure?