Page 33 of 68
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 11:51 am
by sam of the south
Robioto wrote: ↑Wed Aug 13, 2025 11:48 am
Don't worry he will keep me updated! He was my best man and vice versa. Funnily enough, I'm also going to Beer regatta with him tomorrow and Friday, so I will pester. A outside chance we will bump into Dibling's mates too. Will pass on any info!
Do you reckon it will happen?
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 11:53 am
by Gary1878
It feels like we are the only ones in for him and Southampton want to sell.
We are both at the table and need to make a deal. Feels like this will get done
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 11:57 am
by Audrey Horne
blueforyou wrote: ↑Wed Aug 13, 2025 11:50 am
On his way
Do we call him TJ?
on his way where?
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 11:59 am
by blueforyou
Everton Way
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 12:24 pm
by Robioto
I think it will, that's purely my opinion though.
It's clear Dibling wants the move and as we know, more often than not, that usually sees the player move.
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:42 pm
by Brownie
@GiuliaBould on Tyler Dibling & Everton: “If the player indicates he really wants to go, & Southampton are willing to lower their price, Everton would come back to the table. They are now looking at Ipswich’s Omari Hutchinson.” #saintsfc @BBCMerseySport
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:43 pm
by brap2
All rather unimaginative at this point
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:54 pm
by Sir Stealth
Ipswich turned down 35mil for Hutchinson didn’t they?presumably they are looking for about 40-45mil for him
If we prefer Dibling at this point we should probably consider just paying what they want rather than still dropping a massive amount on someone we don’t want as much
Or even worse not signing anybody for the right hand side of midfield and having several spots in the starting 11 where players are playing in an un natural position
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:56 pm
by Bluebridge
Sir Stealth wrote: ↑Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:54 pm
Ipswich turned down 35mil for Hutchinson didn’t they?presumably they are looking for about 40-45mil for him
If we prefer Dibling at this point we should probably consider just paying what they want rather than still dropping a massive amount on someone we don’t want as much
Or even worse not signing anybody for the right hand side of midfield and having several spots in the starting 11 where players are playing in an un natural position
We need to hold our ground, we can’t be seen to be pushovers, the lad is pure potential, nothing more.
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 8:19 pm
by ilikebrunettesisback
Anyone believing guilla needs their heads testing. She doesn't have info on Everton transfers.
The club are using her, not sure if she's even aware of that.
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 8:52 pm
by Jamokachi
ilikebrunettesisback wrote: ↑Wed Aug 13, 2025 8:19 pm
Anyone believing guilla needs their heads testing. She doesn't have info on Everton transfers.
The club are using her, not sure if she's even aware of that.
Of course they are, and she will. It's disingenuous to suggest she wouldn't be, she's not dumb!
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 10:10 pm
by MayorFarnham
Brownie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:42 pm
@GiuliaBould on Tyler Dibling & Everton: “
If the player indicates he really wants to go, & Southampton are willing to lower their price, Everton would come back to the table. They are now looking at Ipswich’s Omari Hutchinson.” #saintsfc @BBCMerseySport
On that basis we could sign any player in the world.
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 10:19 pm
by MmmBlueBranthwaite
ilikebrunettesisback wrote: ↑Wed Aug 13, 2025 8:19 pm
Anyone believing guilla needs their heads testing. She doesn't have info on Everton transfers.
The club are using her, not sure if she's even aware of that.
Misogynistic bollocks
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 10:20 pm
by MmmBlueBranthwaite
Cronuts are the future.
Re: Tyler Dibling
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2025 7:17 am
by ilikebrunettesisback
What is? am i not allowed to refer to her as a she?
Or are you trying to suggest i'm only claiming she's being used because she's a women?
I'd say it's you being misogynistic