Page 36 of 38

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 6:33 pm
by AjaxAndy
brap2 wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 5:36 pm You need to start @ing people imo
How would I do that? I don't keep a log of who said what FFS 🤣

Feel free to trawl the Beto thread if you want.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 6:35 pm
by Audrey Horne
AjaxAndy wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 6:32 pm Ok so you're calling me a liar? What have I got to gain by making that up?

I tell you what, just stop replying to anything I type and I'll do likewise.
Im not saying you are lying per se, just that you will fixate on something and flog it to death regardless of any contrary evidence.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 6:53 pm
by AjaxAndy
Audrey Horne wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 6:35 pm Im not saying you are lying per se, just that you will fixate on something and flog it to death regardless of any contrary evidence.
There's no contrary evidence... I've had the Beto argument numerous times so I remember what was said and what I argued against. You don't, but think you can say I'm talking bull shit because for whatever reason you decided you wanted to.

But then I argued with someone probably @TheRam that he wouldn't get double figures when he scored a few in quick succession and guess what I was right about that too. I'm sure you'll call bull shit on that too even though it actually happened.

The thing is Lizz, if people want to discuss Thelwell and say he's done a good job then that's fine, but also I'm going to bring up Beto because it's an important factor and shouldn't imo just be randomly forgotten about as it doesn't fit the argument of him having spent well.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 7:03 pm
by TheRam
Well done mate.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 7:27 pm
by kramer
brap2 wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 2:09 pm Fun fact about Neal Maupay.

Iliman Ndiayes season at Everton (7 goals 0 assists) ranked against Neal Maupays prem seasons, would rank as Maupays second worst ever season. Trailing only behind his 2022/23 Season 1 goal (Everton).
Not really fair to compare goals between a centre forward and an attacking midfielder, is it?

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 7:31 pm
by brap2
kramer wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 7:27 pm Not really fair to compare goals between a centre forward and an attacking midfielder, is it?
Alright you got me!

Shall we do assists?

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 8:24 pm
by Toddacelli
brap2 wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 7:31 pm Alright you got me!

Shall we do assists?
😂

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 8:25 pm
by Toddacelli
AjaxAndy wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 6:33 am Surely the metric we measure them buy is how they perform for our club?
Er.., usually, yeah. Think this was positioned around why we bought him as well though. So sort of but not quite.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 8:29 pm
by AllyBlue14
I don't understand why we're comparing Maupay and Ndiaye. And I particularly don't understand why we're comparing Maupay at other clubs with Ndiaye at Everton.

I think a few/some/most of us probably saw the logic in signing him, albeit when you bring in a new CF you'd hope for a little more inspiring than Neal fucking Maupay. But he was a massive pile of wank while he was here - sure, the team was poor but he missed way more than his fair share of chances. It wouldn't really matter if he was Messi reincarnate at other clubs, he was awful for us.

Ndiaye's stats aren't exactly mind-blowing but he's a different kind of player, exciting to watch, engages the fans and has played about 2/3 of his matches at Everton playing Dyche anti-football. He's made much more of an impact for us than Maupay ever did and he's managed it without being a complete arsehole to boot.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 10:25 pm
by Bob Sacamano
For what it’s worth re Beto. I think the majority (on here) were excited based on his numbers in Italy and a cool highlight reel. A few on here watch Italian footy and optimistic his strengths would be useful in the PL. Then I think we saw him play about 100mins and altered our expectations. And I think he’s probably performed to these expectations and almost everyone is fine with that.

I don’t think there’s many points to be scored on if he’s a good or bad signing because the majority quickly altered their expectations after watching him.

It’s worth noting these are just my observations from this forum. If you gather opinions from twitter etc that’s a problem in itself and I’m glad that’s a you problem and not a me problem.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2025 6:48 am
by Bluebridge
:lol:
brap2 wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 7:31 pm Alright you got me!

Shall we do assists?

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:32 am
by TheRam
I think I said Beto would be on for double figures this season during his scoring streak.

I didn’t realise my words would come back to haunt me so much.

Feel terrible here.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:52 am
by toffee_scot
Shogun wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:42 am Did sign Beto and Maupay for £40m though, so I'm reticent to give him too much praise.
The Maupay signing made some sense, he’d scored between 8-10 goals a season for Brighton in the past 3 seasons. It seemed an ok option particularly for a second choice striker at that time.

It’s a shame he could only manage one goal in a team that was 30 minutes away from relegation that season. Plus it didn’t help that his behaviour has made him look like a prick.

Beto made sense too, maybe more of a gamble because he hadn’t played in the premier league before but again we were working with terrible financial constraints which limited our options on what potentially decent strikers we could go for.

Shame Dyche didn’t really know how to get the best out of him (or any attacking players this season). Beto still has been useful in a few games and played his part to ensure we were comfortably safe from relegation by March. He’s not been a great signing but not a catastrophic one either.

I’d be ok with us keeping him for another season if Moyes believes he can come up with a plan to get the best out of him.

We also got Chermiti for £15m, I know he’s more an investment for the future and he’s had injury problems. But he’s been here nearly two seasons and I’m not sure he is progressing as much as I hoped he would.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:53 am
by AjaxAndy
TheRam wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:32 am I think I said Beto would be on for double figures this season during his scoring streak.

I didn’t realise my words would come back to haunt me so much.

Feel terrible here.
As you've replied twice now to that then I can definitely see there's genuine remorse. Don't worry there's always next season if we don't buy a striker for your prediction to come true.

In all honesty I couldn't remember if it was you or not, just my point was that I remember what has been said about Beto because it's usually been wrong and I've argued against it at the time. Whether that be double figures by the end of the season or just that if we played him regularly he'd bag 15.

There was also the he's a better one on one finisher than DCL before he then proceeded to miss 4 or 5 in a row.

He's just crap, occasionally not crap, but mainly crap and not suited to this league nor the price we paid. The rest really is irrelevant because that's what the discussion is about at the end of the day.

Re: Thelwell talking strategy

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:57 am
by TheRam
AjaxAndy wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:53 am As you've replied twice now to that then I can definitely see there's genuine remorse. Don't worry there's always next season if we don't buy a striker for your prediction to come true.

In all honesty I couldn't remember if it was you or not, just my point was that I remember what has been said about Beto because it's usually been wrong and I've argued against it at the time. Whether that be double figures by the end of the season or just that if we played him regularly he'd bag 15.

There was also the he's a better one on one finisher than DCL before he then proceeded to miss 4 or 5 in a row.

He's just crap, occasionally not crap, but mainly crap and not suited to this league nor the price we paid. The rest really is irrelevant because that's what the discussion is about at the end of the day.
Please tell me you’re in on the joke at this point.