James Garner

This is the new NSNO Everton forum to discuss the Mighty Blues
brap2
Posts: 1056
Karma: 862

Re: James Garner

Post

cassius wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 5:10 pm A player is labeled as hard working when they run about a lot but is actually a bit crap and doesn't really contribute anything of note.

I was hard working for my 6 a side team.
One of my mates dads once said of me : "he's an honest player"

Which I think is the nicest backhand I've had.
777Kidnappings
Posts: 812
Karma: 349

Re: James Garner

Post

He appears to be a plodder. I do think the balance of our entire midfield is wrong though. Think they all make each other look worse. No footballers, no pace, no one wanting to pass and move No one really wanting to be progressive. Be
cassius
User avatar
Posts: 328
Location: Your mum
Karma: 206

Re: James Garner

Post

Shogun wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 5:25 pm You were class mate, don't listen to them
Thanks mate, if only my dad was as supportive as you.
Escla
Posts: 854
Karma: 217

Re: James Garner

Post

Reportedly we have set a price tag of £20-25 million if Spurs or Newcastle come in for him, o.k. Whose going to be the first to say I’ll drive him there myself !
Cozzie
User avatar
Posts: 1749
Location: Wherever I lay my hat
Karma: 432

Re: James Garner

Post

Escla wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:55 am Reportedly we have set a price tag of £20-25 million if Spurs or Newcastle come in for him, o.k. Whose going to be the first to say I’ll drive him there myself !
I'd say I'd do it, but I reckon he'd be shite company in the car.
Escla
Posts: 854
Karma: 217

Re: James Garner

Post

We paid £9m for him, not sure what some of us thought we would be getting for £9m in todays market but if we can turn a £15m profit on him then we’re cooking with gas again !
AjaxAndy
Posts: 1342
Karma: 584

Re: James Garner

Post

Cozzie wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:04 am I'd say I'd do it, but I reckon he'd be shite company in the car.
He'd be alright in the back but wouldn't be any good further forward.
Goaljira
User avatar
Posts: 900
Karma: 350

Re: James Garner

Post

Escla wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:08 am We paid £9m for him, not sure what some of us thought we would be getting for £9m in todays market but if we can turn a £15m profit on him then we’re cooking with gas again !
https://www.skysports.com/transfer/news ... n-15m-deal

Maybe I'd be a little less harsh on him if he cost £9m? Probably not. He's Tom Davies with better corners.
Escla
Posts: 854
Karma: 217

Re: James Garner

Post

Goaljira wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2024 12:28 pm https://www.skysports.com/transfer/news ... n-15m-deal

Maybe I'd be a little less harsh on him if he cost £9m? Probably not. He's Tom Davies with better corners.

It was £9m plus up to £15m with add ons, can’t imagine we’ve hit any of the criteria for add ons other than number of appearances.
https://theathletic.com/3554604/2022/08 ... -transfer/
brap2
Posts: 1056
Karma: 862

Re: James Garner

Post

Crap

Shogun
User avatar
Posts: 3848
Karma: 2082

Re: James Garner

Post

Not a fan but aren't you going to be high on that list when you play like every minute?
CannockPricey
Posts: 405
Karma: 159

Re: James Garner

Post

Shogun wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 5:01 pm Not a fan but aren't you going to be high on that list when you play like every minute?
Yeah absolutely. Any stat around xg etc etc that doesn't divide it by 90mins becomes a bit meaningless really.
TheRam
Posts: 1584
Karma: 1383

Re: James Garner

Post

If that list was full of rubbish names I’d take it seriously.
brap2
Posts: 1056
Karma: 862

Re: James Garner

Post

TheRam wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 5:38 pm If that list was full of rubbish names I’d take it seriously.
Worries me how good some of the names are on it.

That's a list of risky passers, and James Garner.
Cereal Killer
Posts: 681
Karma: 179

Re: James Garner

Post

Allowed less shots than Douglas Luiz who top clubs want to spend £100m on

We’ve got a gold mine here lads!

:dance:
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic